Sweet lumpy minion, you're the only one that understands. Probably 'cause I haven't sucked the brain out of you yet.

Glory ,'Potential'


Buffista Movies 7: Brides for 7 Samurai  

A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.


Fiona - Mar 01, 2011 9:04:02 am PST #13387 of 30000

Emmett and I have this problem when we discuss Star Wars, every time I talk about "the first Star Wars blah blah blah" and he rejoinders, "You mean the fourth one?"

Oh God, B. and I have so many misunderstandings (~arguments) about this. It's the FIRST film and it is called STAR WARS; deal with it, kid!

But then I do quote B. a lot in my film history lectures with reference to the amount of money Lucas is still making (and, to be fair, the durability of his storytelling), and also the new ways of watching movies on DVD. For a purist like me, who always likes to watch films in one sitting and even has trouble taking a pee break at home, his approach is really something. Whenever it gets too scary or too boring, he zooms. He's through Star Wars in about 45 minutes. The other day I come up to find him whizzing through a scene in "Jedi". I asked him what was going on. "Oh it's really boring. Yoda just dies".

I am absolutely certain that when I saw Star Wars, the Episode IV stuff WAS in the crawl, because all around me the audience was going "huh?". But this was in Scotland in early 1978, so certainly not an original release print.

Edit: this leads me to a related rant, which is about Lucas rewriting history (which he can do because he kept the negative rights). How scary is it that the original versions of all three original films all but disappeared. Han shot first!


Steph L. - Mar 01, 2011 9:12:46 am PST #13388 of 30000
this mess was yours / now your mess is mine

Were we supposed to know that?

I thought so. But maybe the only people who know are those who saw it when it opened?

I saw it when it opened. But then I was 6 or 7, so it probably didn't register with me at all.

Seriously, though? Is that another common-knowledge thing that I've made it to almost 40 without knowing? It's like I live half in a cave.


Fred Pete - Mar 01, 2011 9:24:54 am PST #13389 of 30000
Ann, that's a ferret.

I don't remember Episode IV stuff from the original run in the theater. But pretty early on, it became common knowledge that there were going to be 9 movies, and Star Wars was going to be the fourth.


Kathy A - Mar 01, 2011 9:42:03 am PST #13390 of 30000
We're very stretchy. - Connie Neil

I remember that Time did a big cover article on Star Wars and Lucas either when they announced that Empire was going to be made or when Empire was released (can't remember which), and that's when I first heard about the whole "Episode IV" thing, as well as Lucas's original 9-film planned saga. It was only after that that Lucas changed the title card for Star Wars.


Sue - Mar 01, 2011 10:26:46 am PST #13391 of 30000
hip deep in pie

I remember getting to arguments about the IV thing and hey, I was only 8 when I saw the movie, but I was pretty sure it wasn't there.


SuziQ - Mar 01, 2011 10:59:01 am PST #13392 of 30000
Back tattoos of the mother is that you are absolutely right - Ame

I refuse to call the first movie A New Hope. It is Star Wars. Anything else is subtitle in my world.

Also - which movie was it where they had released posters with a slightly different title which had to be pulled when they decided to change the name. It is in my brain somewhere but my brain is refusing to share with me.


tommyrot - Mar 01, 2011 11:01:18 am PST #13393 of 30000
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Also - which movie was it where they had released posters with a slightly different title which had to be pulled when they decided to change the name. It is in my brain somewhere but my brain is refusing to share with me.

Are you thinking of The Revenge of the Jedi / The Return of the Jedi?

Lucas says the "revenge" was to fool the pirates or something, but I don't think that's true.


SuziQ - Mar 01, 2011 11:26:55 am PST #13394 of 30000
Back tattoos of the mother is that you are absolutely right - Ame

That is it tommy. A friend of mine had gotten one of the "wrong" posters. I'm sure it is quite the collector's item now. I wonder if he kept it.


JZ - Mar 01, 2011 12:14:24 pm PST #13395 of 30000
See? I gave everybody here an opportunity to tell me what a bad person I am and nobody did, because I fuckin' rule.

I was nine or ten when it came out, and I don't even remember how many times I saw it during the first run, and to the best of my recollection Fred Pete and Kathy are totally right -- it wasn't in the original crawl, but the Big Huge Arc plan became common knowledge pretty soon after the first (the REAL ACTUAL first, dammit) movie.


JZ - Mar 01, 2011 12:16:18 pm PST #13396 of 30000
See? I gave everybody here an opportunity to tell me what a bad person I am and nobody did, because I fuckin' rule.

The mom of a friend of mine in high school worked for ILM way back when, and he was very proud to run around school showing off all his cool extra-advance Revenge of the Jedi swag. When the title change was announced, I asked him if he was bummed that the t-shirt he was wearing that very day was now wrong, and he said, "Dude, I was waiting for the bus this morning and some guy offered me fifty bucks for this shirt."