Wow, P-C, that's interesting, because the theatrical ending so clearly left it open, I thought that was the point. Setup for a franchise, in which Salt keeps looking for other sleepers.
Gunn ,'Underneath'
Buffista Movies 7: Brides for 7 Samurai
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
When I popped in the DVD, I had a choice which version to watch, and I had no idea which to pick since I didn't know what the differences were. I usually go with the director's cut if it's there, but I didn't want a longer version since I was short on time, so I said, fuck it, I will just watch the version everyone else watched. And I'm glad because the other ones are so different they would have left me with a very different impression of the movie that couldn't really be compared to those of the theatrical version.
Dark Shadows
I want this movie NOW. You would think after how disappointed I was in Burton's Alice In Wonderland that I wouldn't be so frothingly, giddily excited. But ... Tim Burton. Helena Bonham Carter. Johnny Depp. VAMPIRES. I am so predictable.
(However, I do cling to the theory that Tim does better with things that are darker in theme: Charlie and the Chocolate Factory and Alice In Wonderland vs. Sweeney Todd and Sleepy Hollow. I know which set of movies I consider to be better.)
TL;DR: I am a gothy-goth Tim Burton fangirl, even when I should know better.
Any good advance buzz on Unknown? I'm trying to decide if I will see a movie this weekend.
ita,
the critics reviews are all over the place. I'd like to see it this weekend, but I'm befuddled. I went to metacritic and found no good recommendations.
I looked at rotten tomatoes and got confused because the "positive" reviews had pretty negative excerpts.
So I'm going to take that as a no.
Michael Phillips of the Tribune called it a decently solid action flick that is much better than the usual February fare, and he liked Liam Neeson's performance.
Andrew O'Hehir at Salon gave it a very positive review.
Ebert was decidedly mixed, but really liked most of the actors.
much better than the usual February fare
that is damning with faint praise. Maybe I need to whip out my LOTR dvds.
I wonder if this flick will live up to the creepy potential.