Buffy: How bored were you last year? Giles: I watched 'Passions' with Spike. Let us never speak of it.

'Beneath You'


Buffista Movies 7: Brides for 7 Samurai  

A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.


§ ita § - Jan 03, 2011 10:20:58 am PST #12648 of 30000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Good thing actors don't have to be like their characters. or we'd have too few villains. And probably too few heroes.


Fiona - Jan 03, 2011 10:26:18 am PST #12649 of 30000

Timeline of Technical Filming Innovations please.

David, the newest edition of Monaco's "How to Read a Film" has a whole chapter on technology that could be pretty much what you're looking for. Also, Barry Salt's "Film Style & Technology: History & Analysis" goes in that direction, though the focus is more on style than technology. It's fascinating stuff, though:

[link]

If you find anything else please do let me know!


DavidS - Jan 03, 2011 10:30:47 am PST #12650 of 30000
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

Thanks, Fiona!


Scrappy - Jan 03, 2011 1:16:37 pm PST #12651 of 30000
Life moves pretty fast. You don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.

Went to see Another Year. Loved it, but then I am a total sucker for Mike Leigh's deeply observed character studies. If you like a lot of plot, this will not be your cup of tea. I found it fascinating, entertaining, challenging, disturbing and profoundly moving.

In conclusion, may I say that Jim Broadbent is God.


le nubian - Jan 03, 2011 4:59:55 pm PST #12652 of 30000
"And to be clear, I am the hell. And the high water."

As it happens, I just saw the original True Grit and I like the Coen Brothers version a lot more. It is funny, but the complaint I had about TG (2010) is the ending. It felt really abrupt. I still believe this to be true, but the ending for TG 1969 is worse. Too tidy.

The changes from one movie to the other are interesting. I think 1969 TG has a better plot. There were a couple of improbabilities in TG 10 that were resolved in the original movie.

Nevertheless, I thought Jeff Bridges out-acted John Wayne (pause), no lightning strike, so I guess I'm safe, and the young woman actress was fantastic in the new movie, not so much in the original. Hell, Damon was great too and better than the original.

TG 1969 is 2 hours, where Coen Brothers is 90 minutes. I think the shorter movie helps the plot along a whole lot better.


DavidS - Jan 03, 2011 5:05:34 pm PST #12653 of 30000
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

Hell, Damon was great too and better than the original.

Well, I'd hope Matt Damon could out-act Glen Campbell.

But can Matt sing "Wichita Lineman"?


quester - Jan 03, 2011 5:09:21 pm PST #12654 of 30000
Danger is my middle name, only I spell it R. u. t. h. - Tina Belcher.

I bet he could!


smonster - Jan 03, 2011 5:11:50 pm PST #12655 of 30000
We won’t stop until everyone is gay.

We know he can sing "My Funny Valentine!"


Jessica - Jan 03, 2011 5:16:05 pm PST #12656 of 30000
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

I think the shorter movie helps the plot along a whole lot better.

Totally agree with this - DH and I were noticing that in the original it takes almost an hour for them to head out of town!


Cashmere - Jan 03, 2011 5:23:46 pm PST #12657 of 30000
Now tagless for your comfort.

Totally agree with this - DH and I were noticing that in the original it takes almost an hour for them to head out of town!

So true! And they got to keep the buttermilk line--only it was delivered by Barry Pepper.