The Earhart movie...not Amelie. Amelie was good...very French, but good. The Earhart movie with Hilary Swank(who now always makes me think of the Office poll on her,) was beautiful, but somehow...flat. I don't know why.

Hasn't Anne Hathaway carried a number of recent movies in which she was the protagonist?

Alonso Duralde makes me laugh:

As one critic who caught an early screening confided, "It's not the next 'Showgirls'...but it might be the new 'Coyote Ugly.'" And now that I’ve seen "Burlesque" for myself, I'm in the awkward position of having the defend the honor of "Coyote Ugly."

[link]

I ended up loving every minute of it...including one of the very most romantic moments I've ever seen on film.

The bit where he brings her flours is my number one most romantic film moment of all time ever. Also, I love Will Ferrell. Sorry.

Saw HP7-1 last night. Was impressed by a lot of things--the whole look and feel of the movie. And those kids were in most scenes and I only remember cringing at their acting once...I was really impressed with them.

I was suitably entertained that my brain wasn't going, "But what about..." all that often. I think it had been long enough since I read it that plot points had faded into the background.

I loved, loved, loved the animation of the story of the Three Brothers. So beautiful.

At the same time...like the middle LOTR it felt like an interminable expository trip...to the next film. I felt that the chase with the snatchers could have been cut in place of something else.

Was it really the first time Harry's met Bill? (Where do they find all these good looking gingers anyway? I need to book me a ticket there.)

Because they have to jam so many scenes in the film a lot of scenes don't really have a moment to rest or settle with the actors/audience before they cut away to another scene. I felt this especially with Dobby's death, and a little less with Ron's return. Dobby's death and funeral seemed to be so quick didn't really have a chance to land with me.

Would have loved to have some scenes at Hogwarts. I was sure that one scene on the train would have lead to more Neville and Ginny.

Sue,

this time around it seems the screenwriter has an almost slavish devotion to the book in comparison to the previous movie where they made up stuff out of whole cloth and messed up the narrative. I would agree with you that in a perfect world, it would have been nice to show more Hogwarts, but this wasn't in the book at all, so I guess they decided to err on the side of keeping the narrative structure of the book if it was at all possible. The changes they did make in the movie that were different from the book are inexplicable to me though.

Serial:

I didn't laugh at the kissing scene, but I hated the CGI in that scene.

Also, at Ron's line about the wand he found, "Ten inches, nothing special." Two guys in the theatre burst out laughing, which caused the rest of the audience to laugh.

The bit where he brings her flours is my number one most romantic film moment of all time ever.

Jars gets it in one. The simplicity of that scene just slayed me. I could imagine someone in my life doing that...which is what made it more romantic.

Then again, when I watch what plays as romantic...say two people who have been running around all day after bad guys, etc. and then they start ripping clothes off, all I can think is, "Hey, don't you guys want to take a shower first?"

I may have cleanliness issues.

bonny, bonny, bonny. Revel in the musk. Therein lie pheromones.

I'm with ita on this one. Besides, ya gotta make the most of an adrenaline high while you got it.