My vote is still for no translation, glossary in the back. I mean hell, the books were published by Scholastic - if they can't shoehorn in some vocab educational content, who can?

My vote is still for no translation, glossary in the back.

Which just took me to an Anathem place. I did so much flipping back and forth between the text and glossary that it impeded my enjoyment of the book. Though I think a re-read would be much more enjoyable, because I'd remember a lot of the words now.

Normally, I'd vote no translation, but I think the hyphens alone might kill me: [link]

I got used to glossing over terms I don't understand when I read Louisa May Alcott as a kid. Her books are filled with references to people, places, and items that never left the 19th century, and I just learned to go with the flow.

I'm just skimming, but fully 90% of that list could have been left in the British original text for Americans to read with no impediment to comprehension. I mean, really:

Meanwhile, in the changing rooms,

Meanwhile, in the locker room,

And

Quaffle taken by Slytherin

changed to:

Quaffle taken by the Slytherins

both strike me as being a pointless waste of effort.

This might be my favorite

platters of fat chipolatas

changed to

platters of chipolatas

I think if you are a Br-Am English translator (and I did know someone who did that), you do everything. I know that, as an editor, I make certain changes just because otherwise readers might think we made a mistake.

I read all the Harry Potter books in the British English, except for the last one because I couldn't wait for it. I can hear all the British voices of the characters in my head better that way, but I am also fairly familiar with the vocabulary differences.

I don't mind at all reading a story set in Britain or about British characters that uses British English. It gives it flavor and an air of authenticity, and if something puzzles me too much to guess from context I can always look it up.

However, when I'm reading fanfic and Sam Winchester pulls a face because he thinks Dean said something daft or Teal'c visits Sam Carter in hospital to bring her a tin of crisps, I want to hold the author down and force her to listen to Bert in Mary Poppins.

I don't remember tins of crisps from living in England. They came in bags. That must be a very affected writer. Or they're thinking of Pringles.

Obviously I'm biased--I don't mind if the POV isn't Sam's and he thinks Dean did something daft. Just make sure he doesn't say it.

(although I had to hunt down a British person to figure out what the hell a "modcon" was)

What is a "modcon". But I am with Kathy- I read so many old books with references that I totally didn't get that I can roll with it. Although I did picture the Pevensie children carrying electric light up fake wood torches rather than flashlights because they kept talking about "electric torches"