Wash: Well, I wash my hands of it. It's a hopeless case. I'll read a nice poem at the funeral. Something with imagery. Zoe: You could lock the door and keep the power-hungry maniac at bay. Wash: Oh, no, I'm starting to like this poetry idea now. Here lies my beloved Zoe, my autumn flower, somewhat less attractive now she's all corpsified and gross...

'Shindig'


Spike's Bitches 44: It's about the rules having changed.  

[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.


bon bon - Oct 07, 2009 9:16:22 pm PDT #25663 of 30000
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.

I was randomly in this thread b/c of earwax...anyway there are two privileges -- the right to prevent a spouse from testifying, and the privilege of communications between spouses.

In federal court the witness spouse can choose not to testify. In most state courts the party spouse can elect not to have the spouse testify.

As for the second privilege, it's more complicated -- it belongs to the person who communicated the material, unless it is a criminal case where the victim in the spouse or a civil case between spouses.


§ ita § - Oct 07, 2009 9:19:36 pm PDT #25664 of 30000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Oh, I'd like to be able to run to the nearest police station. Of course, if the crime is against me, I can testify, of course, and if it's against our family, right? What about if my husband is abusing my sister? My sister's husband's child?

It's not about things done, is it, so much as things said, right? So if he comes back to me and said he assaulted my daughter, I can testify? He says he assaulted my sister's daughter? I can report him and get the whole ball rolling? If he assaulted some girl I don't know? Then no?

eta:

unless it is a criminal case where the victim in the spouse

The right doesn't trickle down through the family any?


bon bon - Oct 07, 2009 9:28:21 pm PDT #25665 of 30000
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.

The right doesn't trickle down through the family any?

I should have said "where the victim is the spouse or the children" so you got me there.

So if your husband beat up your sister or daughter, you can testify in federal court, but maybe not in every state court.

You can tell the police whatever you want because spousal privilege would not bar you there (if you told the police something *you* wanted to keep secret, then it's no longer privileged, though.)


erin_obscure - Oct 07, 2009 9:28:22 pm PDT #25666 of 30000
Occasionally I’m callous and strange

I am reassured by the earwax discussed. At some point in grad school i was in casual conversation with several designers and mentioned that i have excessive earwax production which requires regular ear lavages. One of the scenics looked at me very deadpan remarked "And you wonder why you're single?"

So i am glad to see that there are people out there, happily not-single, with excessive earwax.

Me? I love the earhook. It is so much faster and less unpleasant than lavage. Mostly now i just use the murine "loosening" drops once a month to soften up any clumps and let em work their own way free. It works sometimes. I really really dislike the lavage process. It does horrible things to my equilibrium for hours.


§ ita § - Oct 07, 2009 9:31:09 pm PDT #25667 of 30000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

So if your husband beat up your sister or daughter, you can testify in federal court, but maybe not in every state court.

That seems broken to me. What core value of the legal system or the country is stronger for a rule that says that maybe I can't testify that my husband told me he killed my daughter?


bon bon - Oct 07, 2009 9:35:58 pm PDT #25668 of 30000
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.

Spousal privilege is controversial, and state court laws often lag federal ones. The stated justification is promotion of the sanctity of marriage -- there's lots of backwards legislation that use that as a justification.


§ ita § - Oct 07, 2009 9:43:00 pm PDT #25669 of 30000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Not that I'm trotting down the aisle any time soon, but spousal privilege bothers me more than the wrong pre-nup or no pre-nup at all. I mean, we have all these ideas about the sanctity of marriage, but just about any straight couple can do it with minimal effort, realise legal benefits, and then there's the icky privilege tangle which is really not a way I want to get bound up with anyone.

Sanctity of marriage sailed when it became obvious that divorce was required. It's not an unbreakable hallowed bond forged by your deity of choice. It's a legal agreement, and as such I don't really think civilisation will collapse if it's not all the way up at the top of the driven snow.


omnis_audis - Oct 07, 2009 10:52:49 pm PDT #25670 of 30000
omnis, pursue. That's an order from a shy woman who can use M-16. - Shir

:: sits on ear wax bench with erin_o :: I gotta get my ears hooked. Is itchy ears a sign of something? I get lots of wax and itchy ears. Hate it. Is this an allergies thing or something?


billytea - Oct 07, 2009 11:27:13 pm PDT #25671 of 30000
You were a wrong baby who grew up wrong. The wrong kind of wrong. It's better you hear it from a friend.

sits on ear wax bench with erin_o

I can honestly say, not a sentence I expected to see anytime soon.


Seska (the Watcher-in-Training) - Oct 07, 2009 11:57:33 pm PDT #25672 of 30000
"We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh?"

My quick-fire replies to the fifty posts I've just zoomed through:

  • Itchy ears can be nothing more than a sign of excessive ear wax. Get them sorted by the doctor, or try olive oil or purified water (ask a pharmacist which types to buy).

  • There are people who think ear wax production would equal eternal singleness. Hmm. Why, exactly? Sure, occasionally The Girl shouts "You can't hear me! Get your ears looked at!" but otherwise it is not in itself a bar to marital bliss. Also, I snore with similar decibel levels to a plane taking off. The Girl still wants to marry me. She does wear ear-plugs, though. (Taking us full-circle back to ears. It's a beautiful thing.)

  • Combining libraries: we did this the moment we moved in together. I'd much rather share a library than a bank account. We've got the same categories of books. Organized and everything: plays, classic novels, modern literature, non-fiction. We tried alphabetical order, but it's hard to maintain.

  • The Girl can't watch TV without getting sucked in, either - so I too have had to give up my 'TV on in the background' habits. It's been difficult. I listen to the radio at night when she's asleep. It does mean I think more carefully about what I want to watch now.

This has been a post entirely about my nearly-married life. Weird.

I'm having terrible trouble writing my literature review. I struggle a lot with getting into the writing part of research. I need to keep trying until I get past the writer's block, but GAH. Hard.