Is that the sort of thing where "for the money" is understood but they expect you to fill in answers like "I look forward to the challenge of expanding my skillset and taking on responsibilities outside the areas I've previously worked in"?
Ooh. You could give an answer that at first glance they'll think is good, when in fact it's not.
"I look forward to the challenge of enhancing my skillet with eggs and bacon and fresh vegetables."
I need to sit down and read through all these measures because I have a feeling that some of them may make things worse, but I'm not sure which ones those are.
I read through this: [link] and now I'm reading ballotpedia!
Oh, cool, that's exactly what I need.
ION, my label maker just came, and quite aside from the inherent "Yay" of the labelmaker, it came packaged in a clamshell that was easy to open! I'm amazed.
Hey Kat and -t, how are you going to vote on Tuesday?
Shoot, is tomorrow election day? Uh oh.
Timelies all!
Monday. Well, it's not as Monday as it could be, but still, it's Monday.
So if all our legislators vote for these , why are we vetoing?
Perkins, I've only decided on half. I think I'm going to have to read actual text on the rest to be sure, and that is going to suck. But I'm going yes on B&F and no on C.
Ballotpedia is cool!
This is what I think so far:
1A Yes -- I think we need some serious reform and I know that increase in taxes suck and will continue to be an ish but are important to balancing the budget.
1B - Yes. I think increasing discretionary funding is goodish because it allows some district and school site level flexibility.
1C I don't understand enough to decide. It sounds sketch to me.
1D is No because I worry that getting rid of First 5 funding will eventually get rid of early childhood intervention.
1E Dunno. Mental Health Support? Um. No idea.
1F Yes. It's punitive but I'm okay with that.