And boys -- let's watch the swearing.

Mayor ,'Chosen'


Spike's Bitches 43: Who am I kidding? I love to brag.  

[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.


Barb - Jan 11, 2009 5:06:18 am PST #7544 of 10000
“Not dead yet!”

Yeah, since we're in a subdivision of a planned urban development, I think the prevalent mentality is "It's safe here," followed closely by "my dog is in my yard." All of which is true except for when the dog runs out of their yard and is tearing between yards and I'm forced to keep Jas at a sit while the owners chase after their dogs and try to retrieve them.

And like I said, I get the stinkeye for having the temerity to walk my dog past theirs.

Entitlement-- let me shows you it.


Anne W. - Jan 11, 2009 5:11:19 am PST #7545 of 10000
The lost sheep grow teeth, forsake their lambs, and lie with the lions.

Barb, that sort of entitlement absolutely fills me with rage. It's phenomenally unfair to everyone around those people, and unfair to the dog who is allowed to run wild.

What also drives me nuts is when people allow their small dogs to run amok because they're small, and therefore behavior that would be unacceptable in a larger dog is downgraded to "cute."

Edit: I'm also annoyed by people who leave their dogs loose and unattended in a yard bordered only by an invisible fence. I've noticed that dogs bounded by those tend to be more threatening towards passing dogs than dogs with a physical barrier between them and the other dog. Also, people don't seem to understand that a properly motivated dog will plow through the invisible fence, or that invisible fences won't keep other things (coyotes, other dogs) out.


Gris - Jan 11, 2009 5:18:04 am PST #7546 of 10000
Hey. New board.

The bad part about holding a party is waking up the next day with a mild hangover and looking around your apartment.


Steph L. - Jan 11, 2009 5:40:38 am PST #7547 of 10000
I look more rad than Lutheranism

I keep food until it smells, looks, or tastes weird.

I have yet to become ill via this policy.

One of the biggest divisions amongst people -- bigger than the Miracle Whip vs. Mayo divide -- is the Milk Date Controversy. When the date on the carton says "sell by Jan. 11," do you:

(1) pour it down the sink on Jan. 11?

Or

(2) on Jan. 11 (and also the days approaching it and, yes, even AFTER it), sniff the milk, possibly take a small test sip, and then if it smells and tastes fine, use the milk?

I have had violent arguments with people who nuke their milk from orbit as soon as the clocks ticks over to midnight on the date on the carton. (I'm obviously a #2 person.)

First of all, the date is "sell by," not "USE by." Which implies to me that the store isn't going to sell you something that is going to go bad the moment you get it out of the store; you probably have a week (probably less) after the "sell by" date to use the milk.

Second of all -- I am boggled by the people who won't even check their milk (via sniff or tasting it or making a little sibling taste it) before wasting it. Mostly because I'm cheap and hate to waste food.

So -- flame war. Let me have it. What are your positions on the Milk Date Controversy?

t edit I should note that I'm much more judicious if the carton truly says "Use by," rather than "sell by." Although, again, I just look at the date, check the calendar, and sniff the milk before tasting it. But I've had friends who've seen me taste milk that was 1 day past the date on the carton -- whether "sell by" or "use by," who have FLIPPED OUT. Telling me I was disgusting, going to get botulism/salmonella/whatever, etc., etc.

And if it's a week past the date on the carton -- whether "sell by" or "use by," I'm probably going to dump it. A week is my limit, even if it smells okay.


Amy - Jan 11, 2009 5:42:18 am PST #7548 of 10000
Because books.

I am a #2 person wrt Milk Date. But I also disregard exp. dates on OTC drugs, per my brother the pharmacist, who told me they're generally good long past the dates printed.


Lee - Jan 11, 2009 5:42:54 am PST #7549 of 10000
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.

What are your positions on the Milk Date Controversy?

You suck, but are still right about this.


Steph L. - Jan 11, 2009 5:46:36 am PST #7550 of 10000
I look more rad than Lutheranism

I also disregard exp. dates on OTC drugs, per my brother the pharmacist, who told me they're generally good long past the dates printed.

Heh. I disregard exp. dates on all drugs, including Rx. As long as they're pills (not liquid), because pills are dry and much less likely to degrade. Liquids, though, have inactive ingredients that will get weird.

You suck, but are still right about this.

I'm impressed you recognize my rightness despite how much you suck.


amych - Jan 11, 2009 5:47:07 am PST #7551 of 10000
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

Milk Date #2. And I remember earnest explanations printed on milk cartons that the date was only for when the store stopped selling it, but that you were probably perfectly fine for a good week after the date. I figure those must have been a holdover from when they first started putting dates on the cartons in the first place.


Gris - Jan 11, 2009 5:55:24 am PST #7552 of 10000
Hey. New board.

I'm a sniffer.


Laura - Jan 11, 2009 5:55:31 am PST #7553 of 10000
Our wings are not tired.

In my experience it has been obvious when milk is bad, not that it lasts that long here. I never look at the date and probably always take a test sniff before drinking, unless it plops out of the carton and is sent directly to sink. Right now we go through about a gallon a day with the boys so no real risk of spoilage.