{{Sean}} You and S are in my thoughts.
Deep, complicated, interconnected, academic research, and I do it all through the school's library databases
::head explodes a little bit, gets up on soapbox::
If one of my students, or one of the faculty members tells me they've researched their paper using only the databases -- and folks the legal ones are the best ones I've ever seen for content and search algorithym -- I know that they've only skimmed the top of what is actually out there. Estimates are about 20% of what is on our shelves (contemporary) is in the full-text databases. Example: Lexis and Westlaw have about 300-350 full text journals in the databases . . . we subscribe to about 1500 titles, indexed in the legal equivalent of the Reader's Guide, and we're a small law library.
As a librarian, a faculty member, a teacher, etc., I'm horrified by the thought of how academics of all shapes and sizes use this same 20% over and over again without ever seeing anything else. I weep for the knowledge that's getting lost every time a student tells me to "forget it" because he or she can't be bothered to walk to the stacks and get that article that addresses their issue exactly, because there's one online that's kinda-sorta okay enough.
::kicks soapbox back under bed::
(Yeah, I wouldn't want the person I am now grading the papers I wrote in college, either.)