Yeah, whatever happens with that - proven or disproven - I hope it happens fast.
Natter 60: Gone In 60 Seconds
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
HOW TO - Knit a Dissected Rat
Paging David Lynch...
Whatever her choices with regards to her pregnancy and her body, they are HER CHOICES and second-guessing her would be hypocritical in the extreme.
Which Obama should say loudly and repeatedly. And then give a little glare.
I just got off the phone with my sister, who is currently on her long-delayed honeymoon (they married last October) in Hawaii. They're staying on the west coast of Maui in what sounds like a really nice condo within sight of the ocean. When they got there a few days ago, there was an open house going on just down the street, so they got curious and decided to go. While chatting with the real estate agent about where they were from, etc., the agent said that he was a transplant, born in Joliet, IL. Well, that's where Sis and I are from! Turns out, he's a year older than my brother and had dated a girl who was my stepmother's cousin.
Small world.
really small world.
going to open houses while on vacation is such a great idea. well, if you like them I guess. I just love seeing inside houses. I really need to just go on more here in the city, you know in all my free time.
I don't give a damn if she's the Virgin Mary(Although watching her turn up on a taco chip at the convention when she's supposed to be somewhere else would be amusing.) She's too extreme and seems not to know her ass from her armpit. It would be pretty weird for a 16yo to have a Down's baby, but I suppose it could happen. But let's be the one group of people not fixated on this woman's womb...it's hard enough to accept the righties using it as her qualification, imo.
On the lighter side, the Knights Templar are suing the Vatican.
It occurs to me (as someone who is not a lawyer but enjoys trying to think like one) that the suit raises questions of standing. Aren't all current groups claiming to be "Knights Templar" really new groups started from scratch? Having the same name (or even borrowing some rites) from a group wiped out centuries alone doesn't give you rights to sue on their behalf does it? Because it if does, the modern Druids have an awesome suit against Italy.
There has to be some sort of loss shown, right? Some reason to sue? If someone has hard evidence they had a relative who was in the KT, and it caused some hardship for their family, maybe. But that seems like a really difficult thing to prove.
opps. it helps if I refresh. nevermind.