Rule of thumb I learned when I was in the Navy: three thousand pounds per room. I've never gone over my estimate that way. Goody for not-to-exceed clauses, Suzi!
Spike's Bitches 41: Thrown together to stand against the forces of darkness
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
There need to be more resources for the angry and cynical, ie, people like me/us.
The cancer boards tend to run to puppies and kittens and people who write LOL a lot, with extra added wackos.
Ginger, how are they on facts? I know there's a lot of garbage about cancer around and I just wonder.
The cancer boards tend to run to puppies and kittens and people who write LOL a lot, with extra added wackos.
More power to those that sort of thing helps, but gosh. There needs to a place for the snide and bitter.
There needs to a place for the snide and bitter.
See my tag.
Diabetes boards tend to be that way too.
Not that I want everyone angry and cynical. But at least room to be angry would be good.
Happy Birthday, JZ!
Diabetes boards tend to be that way too.
The last place sugary sweetness should be.
The accuracy of sites varies wildly, but there are some really good ones. The American Cancer Society's is good. Breastcancer.org is great. You'll find that a lot of sites, if you read the small print, are sponsored by drug companies. Often they have some good information, but I wonder whether there's an inherent bias. Once you get off the semi-official sites for the different types of cancer, it's the wild west. It's like almost every other kind of web research. The problem is not so much the nonsense as the number of people who don't recognize nonsense.
Yeah, we have pretty good information. Dad was a pathologist. He's at one of the hospitals that his company did the lab work for. It's his old company who did the labs on his case.