What is your B plot? Like the detective is solving a mystery, but also has to deal with her BFF being unlawfully evicted, and she has to step in and finds something out about the Bff's landlord. Something which saves the friend AND maybe sheds light on the main mystery.

yeah, there's a murder, and my narrator's nephews kind of look good for it, but they're not.(The killer is in the family, though...) there's also a houseful of musicians planning a tribute concert(dead guy is a record producer)...maybe some weirdness could show up there, or with the tape my singer narrator is trying to find

Someone doesn't want the concert to go on, because they despised the producer, and that person becomes a suspect but isn't really.

Congratulations Gud!

What Scrappy said about a B plot, erika. Have something going on in the detective's personal life concurrently, even if you have to go back and add it in. Since most mysteries or crime novels are part of a series, it will provide an establishing point for the character outside of the job, and then you develop it in each book.

Link to which this is a rebuttal: [link]

Ah, another holier-than-thou person who turns up his nose at a genre. Time columnist Joel Stein writes that “The only thing more embarrassing than catching a guy on the plane looking at pornography on his computer is seeing a guy on the plane reading “The Hunger Games.” Or a Twilight book. Or Harry Potter. The only time I’m O.K. with an adult holding a children’s book is if he’s moving his mouth as he reads.”

Oh, dear. By these standards, I, and millions of adult readers of young adult fiction, clearly must be quasi-illiterate socially-impaired persons clearly not able to either (A) move past adolescence and/or (B) unable to parse the sophisticated language used in “adult” books, and therefore are incapable of understanding all of them there books for grown-ups. I am covered in shame. SHAME, I tell you!

Actually, I am not. I am laughing my overeducated head off. This article has be a sad cry for attention, right? He admits he’s never read “The Hunger Games,” and as he mentioned the Harry Potter books, I wonder if he has read them either.

Mr. Stein, I’ll let you in on a little secret: to criticize a book or, indeed, an entire genre of books, one must ACTUALLY read them. Otherwise, you operate from a place of ignorance, and dare I say it – it makes you look…well, not so smart.

Mr. Stein: “I have no idea what “The Hunger Games” is like. Maybe there are complicated shades of good and evil in each character. Maybe there are Pynchonesque turns of phrase. Maybe it delves into issues of identity, self-justification and anomie that would make David Foster Wallace proud. I don’t know because it’s a book for kids. I’ll read “The Hunger Games” when I finish the previous 3,000 years of fiction written for adults.”

Ooh, you read PYNCHON! And David Foster Wallace! You must be ever so much smarter than YA readers. By the way, I’m sorry that you are such a slow reader. (Also? There are millions of “adult” books out there, not three thousand.) Personally, I prefer to judge a book on its merits after I have performed the revolutionary and logical act of reading the book for myself and formulating my own opinion. YA, just like any genre, contains books that are truly awful – and like “adult” books, some books that are amazingly well-written, sophisticated in their themes, tropes, plotting, characterizations and prose, and are altogether amazing examples of literature, regardless of the demographic to which they are marketed.

It makes me sad, as an inveterate reader, that you have cut yourself off from many excellent novels because of prejudice. And, it might be said, sexism. Let me analyze your previously quoted statement (bolding is mine): “The only thing more embarrassing than catching a guy on the plane looking at pornography on his computer is seeing a guy on the plane reading “The Hunger Games.” Or a Twilight book. Or Harry Potter. The only time I’m O.K. with an adult holding a children’s book is if he’s moving his mouth as he reads.”

Your intimation is that adult readers are mostly women, and that readers of YA fiction forego the brawny, gritty, excellent-prose strewn world of “adult” books for easy, dumbed-down YA fiction. It draws a parallel between an adult reading YA to a person watching porn – it’s just that embarrassing to read The Hunger Games or the Harry Potter books in…*gasp* PUBLIC.

For the record, I am a proud reader of YA literature. And adult literature. And any other damned type of literature I want to read because it looks like a good story. You stated “I’ll read “The Hunger Games” when I finish the previous 3,000 years of fiction written for adults.” I’m not “too busy” reading these books; I’ve read most of them, loved many and thought other were complete tripe. And I’m not an outlier.

A little background, since there’s plenty of oh-so-amusing background on you, sir. I read up to twenty books a week — of all genres. I taught (continued...)

( continues...) college and high school English. I am a copyeditor and a freelance writer. I’ve read everything from “The Hunger Games” (excellent world building and a genuinely mature and brutal imagining of a dystopian world not too far removed from our own present world) to Margaret Atwood’s “The Handmaid’s Tale” (excellent world building and a genuinely mature and brutal imagining of a dystopian world not too far removed from our own present world – and yes, Atwood’s prose is better than Colllins’, but her writing is far from tripe.)

I was ready to go and take pictures of my entire collection of books — (sorry, some of the YA authors I mentioned I have in my 272 book collection of e-books), which runs the gamut of YA, sci-fi, fantasy, biography, non-fiction and classic and modern litrachur – when I realized I don’t have a damned thing to prove.

I have two degrees in English lit, I’ve read most books from the last, oh, 6000 years (I read Latin, Old English and Middle English) and I read critically, prolifically and, most importantly, I read based on the content of the story. “Never Let Me Go” by Kazuo Ishiguro moved me to tears and to perform more research on the ethics of cloning. “Speak” by Laurie Halse Anderson moved me to tears and – when I taught it in my freshman English class – lead to many critical, intellectual discussions of violence against women and the messages that the media promulgates to both men and women, young and old.

Oh, and by the by, the blurb on the spash page of Mr. Stein’s web site reads “In case you stumbled here by accident, I’m the guy who loves porn and hates America.” This blurb does not instill confidence in your reading habits. I’m not an idiot (despite what you think of my YA reading habit.) I assume you are speaking tongue-in-cheek. Perhaps the porn you are referring to is “The Satyricon?” But if you haven’t read it in the original Latin, you’re missing many wonderful, hilarious political and cultural in-jokes.

But since your (I assume self-penned) bio for the L.A. Times declares you are “desperate for attention,” I must take you at your word and assume your assertions are merely the literary version of “Look at me! Look at ME!” — much as a child shouts this at their parent as they perform some supposedly comedic act.

I looked at you. And yawned.

Excuse me — I must get back to reading any one of a number of the books I am reading right now: my fifth reading of Judith Thurman’s excellent biography of Colette, “Secrets of the Flesh,” the fourth Skulduggery Pleasant book by Derek Landy, my third re-read of “The Remains of the Day” by Kazuo Ishiguro and yes, my re-read of “The Hunger Games.”

Perhaps Neil Gaiman (who writes YA AND adult novels), Laurie Halse Anderson, Jay Asher, Ellen Hopkins or C.S. Lewis (oops, he’s dead, but I imagine his soul is enjoying a hearty belly-laugh at your expense from beyond the grave) can pen a more detailed rebuttal to your “Come out and play, idiot YA readers” call to act…ahem, attention than I can.

Probably not. With the exception of Mr. Lewis, they are probably too busy writing best-selling, smart, savvy, well-written books you will never read to do so.

Maybe you can put the porn down for five minutes (and I have nothing against porn, just self-aggrandizing, self-important attention-seekers who don’t bother with actual research) and read some YA.

(But don’t start with “Twilight.” You’re actually correct on that one: the prose and characterization really is a steaming pile of...well, a steaming pile. Let’s leave it at that.)

But there’s a plethora of excellent YA out there to read. If you’ve got the cojones to do it in public.

I do. But then….I’m just a weak-minded, immature, not-too-intelligent woman.

Sigh. It’s HARD out there for a bibliophilic genius…

Erin:

I applaud your enthusiasm, but your response is giving him waaay more credit than he deserves. I would cut your rant by 50%.

(Also? There are millions of “adult” books out there, not three thousand.)

Actually, what he said was, 3,000 years of adult fiction. You could point out that prior to the last 100 years, there were no hard and fast boundaries between fiction for adults and fiction for children, so his protests don't hold much water.

Good catch.

And good point.

It's reading sort of uncomfortably self-defensive to me, Erin, when you make references to your overeducation and reading in Latin and how many books are on your Kindle, etc.

He's a satirist as well as a columnist, and I don't think his piece was entirely serious. I also think they love to have writers write stuff like this for the coverage and page hits alone. It's an old argument, and it never really goes anywhere.

Which is not to say don't respond. But I would scale it back a lot.