Easy Bake. Flop-a-palooza. Woosh. Pop. I don't skulk.

Angel ,'Shells'


Spike's Bitches 40: Buckle Up, Kids! Daddy's Puttin' the Hammer Down.  

[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.


Fay - Apr 02, 2008 2:32:09 pm PDT #2968 of 10001
"Fuck Western ideologically-motivated gender identification!" Sulu gasped, and came.

...so, the times last night when I wasn't jumping out of bed and running to the loo?

I was dreaming about going to the loo. Or trying to find a loo. Often the loo then turned into a lift, with glass walls, and started moving, thus exposing my plight to the world.

I'm'a stay home today. Sorry, kidlets! (But they're having a half-day, which consists of: watch assembly, do spelling test, have snack and break time, spend remaining hour splashing in pool to celebrate Songkran and shooting each other with waterpistols, eat lunch and/or go home. Easy day.)

(It's my first day off so far, in a year and a half.)


vw bug - Apr 02, 2008 2:35:39 pm PDT #2969 of 10001
Mostly lurking...

Narrative Inheritance: A Case Study in Oral Literature

My only problem with this is that part of what I'm arguing is that, at least in this case, oral literature and literature shouldn't be separate things. So, it feels misleading.


Pix - Apr 02, 2008 2:37:10 pm PDT #2970 of 10001
We're all getting played with, babe. -Weird Barbie

Narrative Inheritance: Oral History As Literature


vw bug - Apr 02, 2008 2:38:44 pm PDT #2971 of 10001
Mostly lurking...

Ha! That's exactly what I was just thinking. Too funny.


amych - Apr 02, 2008 2:40:34 pm PDT #2972 of 10001
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

That's exactly what I was just thinking.

Sounds like a winner, then!

(Incidentally, I'm very excited to see you heading for home on this project.)


vw bug - Apr 02, 2008 2:41:41 pm PDT #2973 of 10001
Mostly lurking...

Incidentally, I'm very excited to see you heading for home on this project.

You and me both! I'm going to finish it on time! Nothing will stop me! (Nobody will believe it!)


Susan W. - Apr 02, 2008 2:42:05 pm PDT #2974 of 10001
Good Trouble and Righteous Fights

I blame way too many years of bookselling, and failing to move endless variations on Blah Blah Pretentious Literarycakes: A Novel.

See, this I can live with if and only if the title confuses the issue without the "A Novel" bit. Like, if my WIP was called The Autobiography of Napoleon Bonaparte (which it is not, and Napoleon is not my personal Dead Guy, either--that would be Wellington), maybe I'd need the "A Novel" so no one would think it was N's actual memoir. But otherwise? So pretentious that it's almost enough to make me not buy the book all by itself.


vw bug - Apr 02, 2008 2:43:47 pm PDT #2975 of 10001
Mostly lurking...

In my defense, I used "A Case Study," because I don't want anyone to think that I've used 50 narrators or something. This is a VERY beginning study of one person...well, actually, one story from one person.


Susan W. - Apr 02, 2008 2:48:19 pm PDT #2976 of 10001
Good Trouble and Righteous Fights

FWIW, vw, I wasn't knocking any of your titles, just tangentially riffing on the Blah Blah Pretentious Literarycakes: A Novel phenomenon. I do think the "Case Study" title was a bit too long, but not pretentious.


amych - Apr 02, 2008 2:48:41 pm PDT #2977 of 10001
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

No defense needed, vw! It's a habitual tic in the book world, which makes reactions like mine something to be aware of -- but there are both legit cases for it, and plenty of opportunity for you to make your methodology clear within the thesis. You don't have to explain it all in the title in this case.