Zoe: Don't think it's a good spot, sir. She still has the advantage over us. Mal: Everyone always does. That's what makes us special.

'Serenity'


Natter 56: ...we need the writers.  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


lisah - Jan 03, 2008 8:59:58 am PST #690 of 10001
Punishingly Intricate

Makes me glad that I'm in a state with a primary so late it doesn't matter how I vote!

My salad was delicious but, of course since I've been eating so much over the holidays, I'm totally hungry again now.


Monique - Jan 03, 2008 9:07:24 am PST #691 of 10001

really wants to see Edwards take Iowa.
Back when I worked at the paper here, he would stop by every now and then after the last elections. There's something really magnetic about Edwards. And I do like the fact that he hasn't harassed me 24/7.

Richardson invited me to ring in the new year with him, by leaving not one but two voicemail messages Monday! I did not take him up on his offer, however.


brenda m - Jan 03, 2008 9:07:56 am PST #692 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

Nevermind.


Daisy Jane - Jan 03, 2008 9:12:58 am PST #693 of 10001
"This bar smells like kerosene and stripper tears."

Edwards is going to be my man I think. I would vote for Kucinich, but I don't think my one vote plus Austin is going to win him Texas.


brenda m - Jan 03, 2008 9:22:12 am PST #694 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

I'm definitely pulling for Edwards. Though, being in Illinois, it's more moral (and monetary) support than votes.


Susan W. - Jan 03, 2008 9:23:02 am PST #695 of 10001
Good Trouble and Righteous Fights

I'm leaning Obama but am really expecting it to be decided before the WA caucus rolls around. I have to admit it annoys me that due to primary/caucus timing, I have about as much voice in choosing my party's nominee as I do, say, choosing the leader of the Labour party in the UK. It seems like the system could be made much more, you know, democratic.

(Don't even get me STARTED on the Electoral College. I went several rounds with my mom last week because I refuse to believe that something the All-Wise Founders thought up in the eighteenth century must necessarily be the best way over two centuries later. She doesn't buy my "one person, one vote, all votes count equally toward the outcome" argument because she really thinks people in rural areas need protection from the dominance of big cities. I don't get it.)


amych - Jan 03, 2008 9:25:35 am PST #696 of 10001
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

I'm thinking of voting for the dog. He's sensible on immigration (fences bad!), the war (love everyone!), and health care (shred all the paperwork!); he has unpresidential hair and a slightly irrational thing about getting his feet wet, but it's really not that much weirder than seeing a UFO at Shirley Maclaine's house. And it's not like my primary vote will count for anything anyway, by the time May rolls around.


Ailleann - Jan 03, 2008 9:27:51 am PST #697 of 10001
vanguard of the socialist Hollywood liberal homosexualist agenda

Who would the dog's running mate be?


msbelle - Jan 03, 2008 9:28:34 am PST #698 of 10001
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb

again, I am lisa. and now I am going to get my building ID and then get more food at some point.


Kathy A - Jan 03, 2008 9:29:22 am PST #699 of 10001
We're very stretchy. - Connie Neil

Not the cat, because then the cat will run everything. (Bush/Cheney = Dog/Cat.)