I think a lot of people see it as a rebellion or a rejection of authority.
'Safe'
Spike's Bitches 39: Cuppa Tea, Cuppa Tea, Almost Got Shagged, Cuppa Tea...
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
Or that you're lazy or slothful....
Or that you're lazy or slothful....
For sure. But why is staying up late inherently more slothful than getting up early? It can't all be about conformity, can it? And frankly, the world being what it is, a lot of us night-owls are getting considerably less sleep than the morning people. If you go to bed at nine and get up at six, that's nine full hours. Who's the slacker now, huh?
Damn that Ben Franklin anyway.
I think it's possible that one can become, if not cheerful to mornings, at least inured to them if one has children. Maybe it's like boot camp -- it breaks you down so as to rebuild you in its image. And some people's circadian rhythms do change with age, just like their metabolisms. But yeah, the assumption that it will change "when you grow up," as it were, is irritating.
Susan - hands are tough. Lots of portraitists didn't bother, you know? Or screwed the pooch and went w/o.
That's what I figured. There was this one portrait of the Duke of Wellington that I would've sworn showed his hands--and it does, to the extent that you can tell that he did, indeed, HAVE hands: [link] But as far as being able to judge their shape and size, NSM. (I found some images from later in his life where I could see his hands, and they match the rest of his build, which was...nice.)
In a weird bit of research serendipity, I did run across a description this morning of Napoleon's hands which matched what I'd deduced from his portraits--that they were surprisingly small and soft.
(Is anyone surprised that my alternate history, and therefore my weird brief obsession with hands in portraiture, features Napoleon and Wellington? No? Didn't think so.)
I go back and forth from being a night/morning person. Mostly I've figured out what works best for me, and I'm happiest when I stick to that. And, that tends to be going to bed around 9 p.m. and getting up around 7:00 a.m. Though, since I have an 8:30 a.m. class this next semester, I'm going to have to fudge with that sleep schedule.
It has been quite the day, and I need a nap. But, before I nap, see vw feed the lorikeets: [link] I took 88 pictures today, and I don't want to post them all. Some of them are kind of crappy. But, I'm too tired to sift through them right now, so that's all you get for now.
Ms Bug, you are a morning person. The night person period must have been was youthful experimentation.
I think it's possible that one can become, if not cheerful to mornings, at least inured to them if one has children.
That's what happened to me. I used to stay up past midnight every night and happily sleep until 10. These days I consider 7:30 "sleeping in." Stoopid babies and their stoopid circadian rhythms.
Ms Bug, you are a morning person.
Yeah, probably, but mostly I think I'm just a person who really likes (and needs) sleep. If I get enough of it, I function well when I get up. If I don't get enough, I hardly function.
Hindu wedding post. It's my future!
BART as a verb.
Sounds like new slang for puking.
I've been using BART as a verb...probably ever since I got here. I think verbifying nouns is almost a given in this age where we Google everything.