Most of the articles there are rated negatively?
There is crack involved?
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
Most of the articles there are rated negatively?
There is crack involved?
Most of the articles there are rated negatively?
There is crack involved?
Ah, good. That makes me feel better. There's logic behind it.
Maybe you wrote a really good article.
Just a thought.
I first read that as "Mastercocks"...
You weren't the only one. What this says about us, I don't want to know. Maybe it just means I've been reading the board too long.
MM, do you have a link to your article? (I couldn't find it.)
There is the chance, though it is slim
Wait, does she know I'm here? I might be just the incentive she needs! And I'm not sure UCSD listed me in the brochure.
I had a bunch of comments and smart-ass remarks to make, but as a I finally catch up, I find they've all been made already. I love you guys.
Or...P-C can take you there...Thanks, P-C!
No problem! That looks like a really interesting website. I may look into it. They do have a section on science articles!
Excellent article, MM. I guess I can't rate it myself because I'm not a Helium member?