We just got back from seeing Grace and now we are taking K to get her hair cut at a place on Magnolia in Burbank. We are busy busy people.
Natter 55: It's the 55th Natter
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
I hate the apostrophe because it is unnecessary
And can be confusing.
I had no idea that the serial comma was thought to be old-fashioned. I think it is just, you know, correct!
Frenchy's, Kat?
Why am I an enormous apostrophe nerd? Here's the Q-n-A that says the Times dropped the apostrophe. [link]
Nope, Robin, Wax Poetic.
Why am I an enormous apostrophe nerd?
Well, you're in good company here!
That's where I go now! Nice peeps.
I dislike the apostrophe, because to me, that indicates a possessive.
Me too.
Is this ad for St. Pauli beer any more offensive than the usual big beer company ads? Because, I'm thinking... no.
Um, no. Heineken's recent campaign (robot girl with a keg where her uterus should be) wins for the most offensive beer ad, in my book.
Well, you're in good company here!
True fact. It's just kind of embarassing how many times I've referred back to that q-n-a since it was originally published.
I'm not super-keen on the St. Pauli ad -- it's only middling on the sexually offensive scale, but it's not my favorite thing ever (not to mention that some beer drinkers are, you know, WOMEN, and ads like that just make me think, "Well, obviously they don't want my money -- I'd better go spend it on a Sam Adams or a Sierra Nevada instead").
The champagne ad really doesn't ping me at all -- ads of the period are full of absinthe fairies and seductive little fruit and grain imps, plus there were actual flesh-and-blood folks like Josephine Baker being all wild and scandalous and performing while wearing lush juicy fruit and not much else. It all feels very, very far removed from current American beer ads.
eta: juliana is right -- that Heineken ad is the very worst of the worst.