Presented without comment:
I have been told by several people in the advertising biz that despite Fox News utterly kicking CNN's ass in the ratings, CNN charges much higher ad rates. Their ad sales, despite having lower total number of viewers, is more lucrative.
Why?
The simple answer is demographics. I have not personally seen the data, but according to these "Ad men," the CNN viewer has much better education and income numbers amongst; Fox news badly trails CNN in this department. The issue of disposable incomes of viewers surely concersn advertisers. One said to me "We can sell basic necessities on Fox and cheap trinkets; We can sell more upscale brands on CNN, and we can sell a lot more upscale goods on CNBC."
[link]
Mine are awesome and I love them and wear them constantly.
With your gauchos?
::never stops crying::
You and the baby Jeez-oo.
*smooch* I make up for my horrid fashion sense by being smart and having nice boobs, right? You love me nevertheless?
And Uggs are ok as far as watertightness goes. I mean, I wouldn't wear them troucing around in 2 foot puddles, but more cause they are sheepskin and PITA to clean. But I've gotten them wet and it hasn't leaked through.
I thought Uggs were water resistant. The Ugg site says that sheepskin is naturally so.
We should follow middle-ages justice practice and throw a sheep in a lake. If it floats, it's waterproof and we can make boots out of it.
I heart google: Kareem Lyder
I was going to say. White girl needs to be beaten with some of that parentally-acquired bling.
ETA: Dude! Wrong on both counts!
Well, he is kind of pritty....
Kareem “K.Pritty” Lyder
I think I read to fast, because I read Kareen "Kitty Pryde" Lyder
I think I read to fast, because I read Kareen "Kitty Pryde" Lyder
So is Kitty Pryde a subset of furries?
