Such pretty pretty princesses!
ION, HIlarious Craigslist post:
My fiance and I are getting married next year by a close friend of the family. As part of our pre-marriage counseling, he wants us to write essays on what we love about each other, our plans for the future, what we consider important in a partner, etc. I'm so busy at work, school and helping him write his essay about me -- can you help me put something together?!? I can't afford much, but if your a romantic interested in helping two soul mates spend the rest of their lives together, it's worth it, right? Email me with you're interest...
No, false imprisonment is actual imprisonment without any right to do so under the law. The "false" part is not having the right to do so. Your example of lying to someone about whether or not they were imprisoned could constitute false imprisonment if it was reasonable that the "prisoner" would believe the door was locked.
Yes, well, I was making with the funny. Or, rather, the logical. Which is all too often the same thing.
Hey Em - I'ma insent you in a minnit.
One bad-ass lawnmower: [link]
Yes, well, I was making with the funny. Or, rather, the logical. Which is all too often the same thing.
Sorry. Your logic did make sense. Thinking about it, false imprisonment is a silly term-of-art for what is really wrongful imprisonment. I bet there's some back-story there but I'm too lazy to look it up.
I was making with the funny. Or, rather, the logical. Which is all too often the same thing.
Wait, wait, I get it! It's a METAPHOR!!
(Miss you, Em.)
Know any global warming skeptics? This might be useful.
What are some of the reasons why "climate sceptics" dispute the evidence that human activities such as industrial emissions of greenhouse gases and deforestation are bringing potentially dangerous changes to the Earth's climate?
As the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) finalises its landmark report for 2007, we look at 10 of the arguments most often made against the IPCC consensus, and some of the counter-arguments made by scientists who agree with the IPCC.
[link]
On NPR SciFriday, one of the climate scientists was pointing out that we base serious policy/personal decisions on conjectures all the time, whether it's what stocks will do, whether an oil field will turn out to be productive, or the point spread on a football game, so why are we so much more resistant to taking steps about climate change?
