Mal ,'Ariel'
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Okay, am I wrong to think this might provide a bit of an ego boost? I mean, if he thinks he's so great he must think I'm pretty awesome if he wants to kiss me.
No offense to my crazy friend, and feel free to call me shallow, but he had a face only a mother could love, dude. Not what I would call an ego boost, even if a member of the X-Men wanted to suck my face.
I don't suppose anyone here is an expert in workers' comp?
Edit: For a thing I'm writing, not personal necessity. In case anyone was worried that I injured myself sitting at my desk.
and feel free to call me shallow, but he had a face only a mother could love, dude.
ha! yeah...plus, CRAZY!
Man, the people are driving me crazy today...and not in a Delusions of Grandeur way. In a KILL KILL KILL you non-email adept rassenfrassers!! !!!!! way.
I don't suppose anyone here is an expert in workers' comp?
Lee may know something about this. Or not. It's been a while since she worked in that department.
I'm halfway through my meetinglist for the day already!
I don't suppose anyone here is an expert in workers' comp?
I have some experience. What do you need to know?
Lee may know something about this. Or not. It's been a while since she worked in that department.
It has, and mostly what I learned was "California has some whack ass laws".
I also have a migraine, and am taking a sick day, but that's not a WC thing.
HAPPY BIRTHDAY, HIL!!!
In case anyone was worried that I injured myself sitting at my desk.
Which is not outside the realm of possibility for some of us.
So my research (supplementing some sad-ass documents from the clients) says that for an injury to be compensable, it must "arise out of" and "occur within" the course and scope of employment.
I've defined "arise out of" as "meaning that the injury is caused by some circumstance of employment" and "occur within" as "meaning that the employee was performing a work-related activity at the time of the injury."
Is that more or less correct? It strikes me as a pretty fine distinction.
I know my boss got workman's comp when she fell walking across the lobby of the building and broke her wrist. I mean, I guess the injury was caused by the circumstance of her walking in her place of employment, and by work-related activity I suppose walking into the building is work-related. But in my experience workman's comp is pretty broad, and your definition sounds narrower than I'd expect.