My work's illegal, but at least it's honest.

Mal ,'Shindig'


Procedurals 1: Anything You Say Can and Will Be Used Against You.

This thread is for procedural TV, shows where the primary idea is to figure out the case. [NAFDA]


-t - Oct 20, 2009 4:06:04 pm PDT #3869 of 11831
I am a woman of various inclinations and only some of the time are they to burn everything down in frustration

Yay


dcp - Oct 20, 2009 4:10:32 pm PDT #3870 of 11831
The more I learn, the more I realize how little I know.

Yay!


Juliebird - Oct 20, 2009 5:00:45 pm PDT #3871 of 11831
I am the fly who dreams of the spider

Fantabulous!

Beckett was beyond hot last night at the book party. I think erotic would be a better word.

It seems that just about every show that I'm watching there's me waiting for the leads to get it on already. But I swear that watching Castle and Beckett's "breakup" that they were going to grab each other and mack. (Okay, on Lie to Me I was praying for a deep satisfying hug, because Cal and Gillian just aren't afraid to touch each other, which I find so incredibly refreshing). And then there's Bones and that whole new level of intimacy that they reached. Hmmm. Did all of these shows just finally sync up their menstrual cycles?


shrift - Oct 20, 2009 5:12:34 pm PDT #3872 of 11831
"You can't put a price on the joy of not giving a shit." -Zenkitty

Oh, dude! Encino Man is on NCIS tonight!

And yayyyy for the Castle full season pickup.


§ ita § - Oct 20, 2009 5:13:39 pm PDT #3873 of 11831
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

there's Bones and that whole new level of intimacy that they reached

I don't think you saw the same episode I saw. All I can see when I watch is cat and mouse with the audience.

I think Castle plays it very well. They both like each other, but they aren't pining, but they did both get a bit panicky when they thought walking away was what was the sensible thing to do. Because it's a very nice excuse.


Connie Neil - Oct 20, 2009 7:22:32 pm PDT #3874 of 11831
brillig

Does anyone else think NCIS: LA is aiming at a demographic of gay men? With the bromance, and the tight shirts, and the tight pants that Heddy even commented on, and Dom fiddling with his nipples--sorry, the buttons?


§ ita § - Oct 20, 2009 7:27:05 pm PDT #3875 of 11831
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

They keep scantily and tightly dressing Kenzie, so I think they're just peddling lust.

I am going to try this week again because there's supposed to be Abby. Hmmm.


victor infante - Oct 21, 2009 5:34:37 am PDT #3876 of 11831
To understand what happened at the diner, we shall use Mr. Papaya! This is upsetting because he's the friendliest of fruits.

It seems that just about every show that I'm watching there's me waiting for the leads to get it on already.

Shhhh!!!! Have we forgotten the lessons of "Moonlighting"?!?! (Which is relevant, as it's definitely one of "Castle's" direct ancestors, along with "Remington Steele.") As soon as they get it on, it's over. Bad, bad things will happen.


le nubian - Oct 21, 2009 5:36:50 am PDT #3877 of 11831
"And to be clear, I am the hell. And the high water."

this is a pretty persuasive article about "moonlighting" and that leads having sex aren't a death knell.

[link]


Vortex - Oct 21, 2009 5:38:46 am PDT #3878 of 11831
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman

I think that it's not necessarily that the leads having sex is a death knell, it's that when they decide that the leads should have sex, it's usually a last ditch effort to save the show because nothing else (including the sexual tension) is working. So, the show is probably ending anyway, and the sex is an attempt to save it.