Actually, there was a pamphlet by John Knox that used that phrase first. Never read it, but have seen it referenced elsewhere.
'Just Rewards (2)'
Procedurals 1: Anything You Say Can and Will Be Used Against You.
This thread is for procedural TV, shows where the primary idea is to figure out the case. [NAFDA]
a 16th century religious tract.
Ooohhh...off to google.
I did google, but given my browser history, ALL the references I found were TP related.
It's mentioned in the Wikipedia article for the Pratchett novel, that could get you started.
Oh my. I'm there now.
Actually, there was a pamphlet by John Knox that used that phrase first. Never read it, but have seen it referenced elsewhere.
That's where the Laurie King novel got it, yeah.
John Knox, yeah, that's the one. All I could remember was "anti-Catholic" and now I'm not even sure that's right.
Oh, I'm pretty sure he was ... anti-Catholic and a multitude of others.
On Elementary, I was disappointed when Luke Duke didn't turn out to be the killer (going by the "most famous guest star" theory). Though perhaps Tom Wopat wasn't the most famous guest star (unless you're a woman who grew up watching Dukes of Hazzard). (And, now that I think about it, Reed Diamond wasn't the killer in his episode, either.)
I absolutely loved when neuro-atypical Fiona told Sherlock "I don't know WHAT you are." I've always thought JLM plays Sherlock as neurodiverse in one way or another.
I didn't even realize it was Wopat until reading your post.
I recognized Wopat, and was with Steph, thinking that he would be the killer.