And given the fact that Pelant was a sick fuck with contingency upon contingency, I would not have been strolling casually out of the building. I would have been hustling out of there and calling the bomb squad, HAZMAT and SWAT.
William ,'Conversations with Dead People'
Procedurals 1: Anything You Say Can and Will Be Used Against You.
This thread is for procedural TV, shows where the primary idea is to figure out the case. [NAFDA]
And given the fact that Pelant was a suck fuck with contingency upon contingency, I would not have been strolling casually out of the building. I would have been hustling out of there and calling the bomb squad, HAZMAT and SWAT.
Yeah, that is what I meant.
I would have been hustling out of there and calling the bomb squad, HAZMAT and SWAT.
SO. MUCH. THIS.
We never really came to a firm consensus about Person of Interest, did we?
IMO, I think it is kind of the show's fault. About 80-90% of the show is (has been?) squarely procedural. But then there is the 1-2 eps a year that focus on the computer. We don't even know (really) what the computer *is*, its capabilities, and how that will drive the story.
What le nubian said wrt Persons of Interest.
Yes, I am completely willing to blame the show.
If it ain't broke, don't fix. Let's just leave it, and if someone posts in Boxed Set, direct them here.
If it ain't broke, don't fix. Let's just leave it, and if someone posts in Boxed Set, direct them here.
I agree with this, and at the same time, I don't see a problem with talking about the sci-fi elements of the show here, if people want to discuss them. I thought the Root parts of this week's episode were particularly interesting, and also kick ass.
Ok. I am extremely intrigued by what The Machine is doing with Root. I also wonder if The Machine read a lot of Asimov, and has willingly absorbed the Three Laws of Robotics (or if some analogous subroutine is an inherent part of how Harold designed the program).