It was DeBeers who started the whole "diamonds are THE engagement ring stone" thing, and it backfired, because now that's the only thing people use diamonds for. That's why they started that ridiculous "right hand ring" business.
Spike's Bitches 37: You take the killing for granted.
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
My engagement ring is a sapphire.
My engagement ring is a sapphire.
FIGHT THE POWER!
For all that, I'm not overly emotionally attached to jewelry (Although Miracleman and Aimee may disagree, having had to look for the damned things for over an hour).
'Twas the food that let us find it!
I'm pretty sure a friend of mine chose ruby for hers (her parents are jewelers, and they made it for her - they also made the wedding bands). I think there might be tiny diamonds in addition, but the ruby was the main gem.
No engagement ring and matching plain gold bands for wedding rings. The DH never wears any jewelery but a watch and told me he'd buy the ring for himself but didn't dig the symbolism and didn't think he would wear it. He has not only worn it every day since but I found out that when he has been doing labor around the house, he puts it on a chain and wears it around his neck. He's a cutiehead, that one.
Vortex, did you see this NY Times article? Condo developers may be promising more than they can deliver. Shocking, isn't it?
Not really. That's why I had a housing inspector at my walkthrough. He measured water temp and pressure, etc.
Needless to say, Barney is now Paul's forever.
Awww, you're going to be Paul's favorite teacher ever for ever and ever.
As JZ notes we decided against diamonds because (a) she thinks the diamond business is evil and (b) we couldn't afford it. But the alternative was the very nice gold ring with a Hebrew inscription from the Song of Solomon which, frankly, is cooler for us anyway.
Plus, Nilly then went and pointed out the double meaning in the quote so it was extra good.
But (a) would have trumped everything else even if (b) hadn't been a factor. I would, however, not be at all averse, should (b) ever cease to be a factor, to lab-created diamonds. The DeBeers people have been flailing about wildly over the last couple of years about how lab-created diamonds don't count, but I could frankly not possibly give less of a shit about what the DeBeers people say.
Unless they were to say it at a joint conference joined by Messrs. Vick and Gonzales; then I might give an exponentially tinier shit what they say. But only then.