I posted this question before and it got lost, but I think I'll try now when the board is slow--
I am typing a contract with the following sentance about payment. Does anyone else think it is fucked up, or is it legalese. It was written by a nurse with an MBA, not a lawyer:
Payment will be a shared assumption of MY UNIVERSITY 60% and TEACHER'S INITIALS. of 40% minus expenses. Expenses will include copying required course materials chosen by instructor, refreshments, and bulk mailings.
That's awesome, paperdol!
Yes, I had to read it. And honestly, there wasn't very much actual spanking, which struck me as quite odd. It was awful. I'm all for good erotic, but this ... wasn't.
I wish I could listen to the interview, but alas, it isn't to be, darnit.
ION, I still hate teeth. Or sinuses. I can't tell which is the cause but I'm pretty unthrilled with both right now.
Will the paperdoll interview be available online later?
Dunno if I can actually be at my desk in 35 minutes....
Apparently everyone was still denying it yesterday.
Isn't official denial our first clue that something is true with the current administration?
Holy crap. Did we know that Greece is on fire? [link]
Did we know that Greece is on fire?
Yeah. For some reason it's not getting much coverage in the US media.
Payment will be a shared assumption of MY UNIVERSITY 60% and TEACHER'S INITIALS. of 40% minus expenses. Expenses will include copying required course materials chosen by instructor, refreshments, and bulk mailings.
I'm not a lawyer, but the first sentence could be tweaked so it isn't in passive voice (which could very well be accepted in legal contracts, but wasn't by my English Lit profs in college).