Glory ,'Potential'
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Office Space: The Musical!!
I would pay good money to see this.
red velvet cake
Good grief, people! I hadn't thought of red velvet cake in, like, years. Then I got one for my birthday. It was delicious. Then? My doctor told me to stop eating wheat. Now? Every single day somebody mentions red velvet cake! And I can't have any! Stop it! Getoutgetoutgetout!
This kind of thing can easily be done in new york with all the alt-comedy and off-off-off-broadway stages. Until the c&d letter comes in, which it will. (I'll do the doomsaying!)
I just had to call my brother to get my cellphone number.
I didn't bring it with me and I don't know it yet!!
oh. I have already got a page in my book marks with all the studio and producer info. I think I'd start with a letter to Mike Judge though.
Follow that dream!
Don't dream it, be it!
Do or do not; there is no try.
Heh.
First, Pants Man Loses Case. Next, His Job.
By the middle of next week, Roy Pearson, the D.C. administrative law judge who sued his neighborhood dry cleaners for $54 million and lost, will receive a letter that starts the process of putting him out of a job.
City sources tell me that a marathon meeting of the commission that reviews the performance of administrative law judges (ALJs) ended last night with unanimous agreement to meet again next Monday to revise and finalize the wording of a letter that will state the panel's doubts about granting Pearson the 10-year reappointment that he has been seeking throughout the last months of his battle against Custom Cleaners and its owners, the Chung family.
...
Within the commission, the discussion about Pearson's future has focused on when and whether it is right to measure a judge's performance by his behavior outside the courtroom. The panel looked specifically at whether Pearson's extraordinary zeal in pursuing the case against the Chungs was so frivolous and embarrassing to the judicial system that it should be taken as evidence of his lack of judicial temperment. "A judge has a right to bring a lawsuit like any other citizen," said a source close to the commission, "but he doesn't have a First Amendment right to bring a frivolous lawsuit."
Friday afternoon LOLcat: communing with the mothership.
then a love song for Milton to his stapler.
Oh, my god, YES.