That whole "pick her up and slide underneath her and put her back down again" move is smooooooooooth and couldn't be hotter even if both parties were literally on fire at the time.
I'm confused, though; is the rightful owner of the body being possessed present or not? Innocent or not? Because Ruby went shopping for a vacant body, which is good, but then stuck a knife through the throat of someone during Sam's training lessons. If there was a demon in there and Sam wasn't strong enough to kick it out using his mind mojo, there's always the more traditional Latin incantation. Y'know, for the purists.
I think I've about had my fill of the black/white dichotomy of Dean=good, Sam=evil that the show has going on. (Dean's an extra special snowflake that Anna says all the angels are talking about, they worried about saving him, they think he has a pivotal role to play in saving mankind. He gets to decide if a town gets nuked, and he no longer sleeps with stray bar wenches, he apparently beds girls who can hear angels. Sam is viewed as an evil-doer and is threatened with annihilation by the angels pretty much every time he turns around, and even though he's spent most of his life trying to help others, he's being damned for something that occurred when he was 6 months old and that he had no control over, and HE gets to sleep with a demon inhabiting a dead body.) I am inordinately pleased that now 9 episodes into the season the writers have finally remembered that the show is essentially about two characters, and gave us some of the backstory on Sam, but as I said, I'm tired of the black/white issues. This show should be better at portraying shades of gray.
I don't think the fact that Ruby wants to help them really changes the fact that, technically, she's still a demon. Also, she's on the lam, so I don't know that she probably cares too much for leaving demons behind who know where she is. The Latin flavor sends them back to hell, it doesn't destroy them.
Yes. Yes it is.
Belatedly realizing what a dangerous thing to say that was on this board.
::waves politically agnostic flag::
I want to see my show!! What is this ball with the foot thing that makes TV Guide a liar?!
That whole "pick her up and slide underneath her and put her back down again" move is smooooooooooth and couldn't be hotter even if both parties were literally on fire at the time.
Yeah. I'd be in my bunk if I wasn't trying to recognize ANYONE on ER.
Belatedly realizing what a dangerous thing to say that was on this board.
Oh my gosh, I hope you know I was totally kidding. **Hugs**
Yeah. I'd be in my bunk if I wasn't trying to recognize ANYONE on ER.
That's right, you're to blame for me discovering that cutie John Stamos has a spare tire. My illusions are shattered.
Oh my gosh, I hope you know I was totally kidding. **Hugs**
No worries! I'm comfortable with the maturity of this community (moreso than I am with my own maturity), although more often than not I am confronted with views that I didn't realize I am contrary to.
Like Obama being the Anti-Christ, and Michele being Satan*. But I digress. Or maybe it's on topic, who's to say? ;) (Politicians are like God to me: I don't refute that they exist, but I doubt their good intent towards humanity).
*clarifying that that is ::my:: view, and three glasses of consolation wine (for not being able to watch SPN) makes me too lazy to make it work in a single sentence, and is not an example of what I find to be a general opinion of the board --been talking to too many lawyers today.
That's right, you're to blame for me discovering that cutie John Stamos has a spare tire. My illusions are shattered.
yay, now I'm recognizing all kinds of people.
That's right, you're to blame for me discovering that cutie John Stamos has a spare tire. My illusions are shattered.
Dude's in his mid-forties, it's difficult to avoid by that age. And I'd still leave muddy bootprints stepping on JA to get a shot at him, which I cannot say about most celebrities.
