A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: Jon B, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych, msbelle, shrift, Dana, Laura
Stompy Emerita: ita, DXMachina
I feel badly for the people who might want to discuss such things and have nowhere to do it.
If we'd said, oh, a month ago, "hey, I'll bet some crazy person is going to post photos of every page of HP and a massive kerfuffle will erupt about whether they're real or not; we can fit that into the spoilers thread, no?" I would've been all for discussing it with enough time for spoiler folk to weigh in, warning notices/jump links posted, etc. etc. etc.". At this point, I just have to say "what Jon said".
(Note: don't care one way or t'other about HP, but messing with spoiler policies on no notice is way bigger than what's covered in the previous consensus.) (And hey, nothing wrong with linking people to discussions elsewhere, as long as the links are marked as spoilery.)
I think the
only
options are to open BC 2 right away, and probably retitle it HP SPOILERS AHOY SERIOUSLY YO (2), or to wait until midnight whichever night and just hold it until then. I don't have a dog in this fight, so I won't weigh in on which of those, but anything else is just open big ass cans of worms.
This is like the prologue to the Potterdammerung.
I had not thought my suggestion through and I have now joined the "no spoilers" club. I'm normally a spoiler whore, even for books, but this is a special occasion.
There have to be other places to discuss the spoilers. I kinda think we need to be ok with saying that about some things brought up.
It's two sides of the same coin to me, with the low # of yes/no voters on some recent issues.
why does this site have to house a thread for every discussion 10 people will vote yes for?
yes, hyperbole.
This is like the prologue to the Potterdammerung.
I have the Sigfried's Funeral Music on the stereo right now AIFG!!
why does this site have to house a thread for every discussion 10 people will vote yes for?
Agree that we need to be ok saying we can't be all things to everyone, but it's hard to bring this up in practice. Everybody wants everyone else to be happy and we're getting to a tragedy of the commons here.
Everybody wants everyone else to be happy
you just made me cackle out loud.
Not to interrupt perfectly good and interesting Bureau talk where I finally don't have a big dog in the fight, but what needs to happen to get the Supernatural vote going?
