Could a stompy please change me just to "Pix"? Thanks.
Buffy ,'Beneath You'
Bureaucracy 4: Like Job. No, really, just like Job
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: Jon B, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych, msbelle, shrift, Dana, Laura
Stompy Emerita: ita, DXMachina
We have a much more definable referrer spike (NPI) from TWOP, from the Vampire Diaries recap that mentions BBOC.
Was it okay that I linked to the FAQ? I know linking to the thread is wrong bad wrong, but I figured the FAQ was okay.
As per all the posting stats, it warms my cold, cold heart that I'm still showing up on the stat tables for spoilers, spoilers lite, and light bulbs. I'm glad I'm finally out of the B'crazy gang of 14, though. Hope this post doesn't screw it up.
Somewhere out there, there's a post where I summed up the Guscapades (for Heather/Daisy Jane, I think). And in my opinion, if there's a Fast Eddie/TV Tropes entry in the FAQ (if, if, if) then we should link to the thread where Gus first proposed creating the site, and then to my post (maybe on Gus's name) so that people get the story of Gus.
I've linked to TV Tropes, when needed, for assignments, and then promptly thrown up. Seriously. That was my worst time ever as a Buffista. I never felt the same here, again. So yeah, I don't want to give him a lot of attention, but I also don't want people to be unable to ascertain that Gus/Kimi/Janitor/Fast Eddie are all the same person, and that that person is a huge-ass creep, or at least was -- to us.
The post Cindy refers to is here: Topic!Cindy "Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?" Jan 6, 2007 5:26:28 am PST
I missed most of this myself, and am glad the link exists.
Cindy, I think it's perfectly fine to link to the FAQ, and see no reason why it wouldn't be! But maybe I'm not different from other buffistas?
I'm with meara.
Are we worrying unnecessarily? How likely is it that someone will come here specifically looking for info on Gus and the origins of TV Tropes?
I don't consider the FAQ a reaction to worry. I consider it a repository of facts, and if something generated a lot of questions, why not deem them frequently asked and answer them there?
I don't see a downside to laying out the information.
I don't see a downside to having the information readily and easily available. Even if it's just for us.
I know I personally flinch when people here or elsewhere ask because it means going over it again. Having an entry to point to and not have to relive it all in my head every time, even if it is someone else recapping, makes sense to me.
It's a question that has been frequently asked.
This reminds me that I promised to work on the FAQ. I need to get on that.
I'm agnostic about the FAQ entry. While I'd rather not relive it, I agree that it would be great to have a place, to which, any future questions can be quickly dispatched.
More than anything, I truly appreciate Cindy's rational and efficient recap. She's got a talent for such things!