I am a big grudge holder, but they actually don't bother me either.
Bureaucracy 4: Like Job. No, really, just like Job
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: Jon B, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych, msbelle, shrift, Dana, Laura
Stompy Emerita: ita, DXMachina
I say leave them; they happened and are part of our story.
This reminds me, I'm supposed to be updating the FAQ.
They don't bother me, but part of me wants you to just put the name in quotes: "Gus." I don't know what that makes me feel better (or giggle), but it does.
Your suggestion makes me giggle.
I also like that idea.
Or we just change the handle to Fast Eddie, so that anyone coming here can see if plain text where he committed psuedicide.
Ooh, can we retroactively add an asterisk to his name in the archives?
[xposty w/ ND]
I don't think changing the name would really clear anything up. I mean, we've tried to stay *out* of the spotlight more than shine a light on anything.
Plus it's icky precedent to me to change anyone's pseud without their express wishes. We're a public site.
Plus it's icky precedent to me to change anyone's pseud without their express wishes. We're a public site.
I'm not sure yet what I think of the idea of indicating on-board that Gus was a fake (I see massive pros and cons), but if we were to do so, I would rather not see it done via changing the pseud. A clearly labeled Stompy Note in the tagline or in the profile would be the way I would like to see that done if we go that route. If we alter Gus's words or self-representation, it needs to be clear where, how, and why it was done.