Scrappy, I agree.
ETA: Also (and speaking as the person responsible for the name of the last Natter), the naming consensus seems even more bullshit of late.
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: Jon B, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych, msbelle, shrift, Dana, Laura
Stompy Emerita: ita, DXMachina
Scrappy, I agree.
ETA: Also (and speaking as the person responsible for the name of the last Natter), the naming consensus seems even more bullshit of late.
We're doing it too late is the problem, I think - by the time we start throwing out ideas the thread is dead and the stompy has to just grab something.
People! Let's get it together.
Oh, but brenda, remember when we've started too early and had issues there, too.
Were there really no retirement-age oriented suggestions?
Natter 62: Dancin' in the streets
Natter 64 will, of course, be "Will you still love me?", right?
Natter 64: We still need you!
Will you still feed me?
the naming consensus seems even more bullshit of late.
It probably is, but I just did the (extremely complicated) math. 62nd Natter had three supporters, Freud had two, and that was pretty much it.
the naming consensus seems even more bullshit of late.
I think the last "formal" statement on the topic wasn't consensus, but whatever the creating stompy preferred.
PUPPYCAM!