I agree with this:
There seems to me to be a world of difference between Rand's "we are your natural free-market overlords" approach and Bird's "don't discriminate against my talent" thing.
if I leave out the "Bird's" - but I've only seen
The Incredibles
wherein the meddling government mucks up the better society the supers could have created. Admittedly, not a lot of overt economics, but I strongly got the sense that Bird thought he was my free-market overlord.
I'm guessing
Ratatouille
is lighter on that note, because other than government health codes I'm not sure how he could weave it in.
because other than government health codes I'm not sure how he could weave it in.
No way I can properly respond without spoilers except to say "Huh. I hadn't thought of it that way before."
We just got back from Stardust.
If I wasn't familiar with the source material, I probably would have really liked it. The movie Stardust had barely any of the charm, whimsy, or eccentricity that I love so much about the written version.
I saw the movie first and then read the book. I did think the movie had its charm, although it was a bit conventional. The book was a bit of a shock. I didn't love the book -- although I did like it -- and I wonder if that was because I kept looking for the movie in the pages.
*** The movie sure went looking for more "action" (violence) at the expense of character development and some relaxed charm.
The ending is what has me thinking right now, though. In both, Tristan and the Star get together. But in the movie they have children and grandchilden and then each become stars, united forever. Very conventional ending to a fairy tale - a "Happy Ever After." In the book, the Star cannot bear children, and Tristan ages and dies while the Star does not. I thought it was a more interesting ending. ***
Please, please, somebody at least tell me Claire Danes was good. Because otherwise my heart may completely break.
I didn't love the book -- although I did like it -- and I wonder if that was because I kept looking for the movie in the pages.
I think that's what happened to me, Narrator.
Please, please, somebody at least tell me Claire Danes was good.
I thought she was good. She was haughty and put-upon and eventually soft and lovely, but she's a little toned down from the character in the book, who's a little angrier and insulting.
I liked her well enough. I didn't need her efforts at a British accent, but, ok. I read somewhere that Sarah Michele Gellar was offered the role and declined because she didn't want to be away from her hubby. Well, fine, but she had a chance to be in a movie with Robert DeNiro. I'm surprised anyone would pass that up.
If the
British accent
was part and parcel of the role, it's no mystery to me why she'd turn it down. I still shudder whenever I
hear her speak in "Halloween"
.
The more I hear about the differences between the movie and book versions, the more I am convinced to not see the movie.
I agree very much with Jilli's assessment of Stardust and the part that Narrator mentions regarding
the end
was the part I especially had a problem with,
to go from there are no real happily ever afters in the book to a very trite happily ever after ending in the moive was annoying.
I haven't yet read the book, and I expect to like it, but I liked the movie, and I admit I do like
happy endings. I've had enough life-sucks endings in real life. I tend to get depressed over unhappy endings. But that's just me.
And also just me, but I didn't find that
a Star living and aging and bearing children and suffering and dying in a mortal life was entirely happy; she wouldn't have wanted it if she weren't with her love. What's so great about a normal human life, anyway? Love is all that makes it tolerable. (Which is why I hated City of Angels, by the way.) I hate the common fantasy trope that Living a Short Mortal Human Life and Then Dying is the Best Thing Ever.
And, furthermore, because this post needs more further,
when he became a Star too, the first thing I thought was, how sad, look how far apart from each other they are! They're now doomed to be near each other but never touch forever.
So, happy ending, I guess, but hardly skippity-doo-dah,
at least not for morbid depressive me.