Just got back from the new Bond movie. It was kinda meh. There wasn't much of a plot (even for a Bond movie), and the action sequences were a mess.

We saw the new Watchmen trailer on the big screen. Ooooooh. And the trailer for the new Star Trek movie, which brings the slash right away, bless 'em.

Jilli, a friend of mine in Wales said about the same thing. He was unimpressed.

Bond:

I too found it a bit meh. But I *adored* the action, even if I found it a bit confusing (2 too many sequences intersplicing the action with other "action"). Emotionally, I didn't feel it. And when it got to the end, I wasn't sure if it was ending, and before it ended, I thought it was about to end. The end I thought the pacing and structure fell apart.

I liked that the whole movie was Bond working through his feelings about Vespa, but I didn't feel the end. I didn't feel closure, or, um, that he'd obtained his measure of peace, or even that he hadn't. I liked M going on about not knowing who to trust, and that if you can't tell your enemies from your friends you should get out, and then putting her faith in Bond.

I wonder that if there are more Daniel Craig Bond movies, that they'll keep searching for this organization that nobody knows exists (or did I miss that in my confusion and that matter is resolved?)

Did the actor playing Greene remind anyone of Gaius Baltar?

cereal

I put this in Boxed Set by mistake: [link]

Video review of Quantum, hits upon some of the issues that I had.

Not really spoilery, deals in very vague terms.

I actually liked QoS, because the bad guy's plot actually makes sense (in a break from usual Bond) and the main female other than M was actually competent. But I like the new serious Bond better than the goofy 70s Bond, even to the point that I was OK with no Q. And I liked that it was artsy.

My friend and I picked out all (?) of the references to other Bond films, but I think there were a number of refs to other movies (Chinatown being the most obvious)...and they even did a shout out to the end of Tosca.

And yes, the bad guy was Gaius Baltar. With less of a conscience.

I found the endless chasing exhausting to watch. I mean, Bond movies are always going to be heavy on the action, but at some point I do like the characters to be able to just sit down and talk. And I just didn't think the action was done as well in this one as in Casino Royale.

(And the opening car chase looked exactly like Yoshie's Island on MarioKart, which I found distracting. I kept expecting Bond to get a speed boost from a giant mushroom.)

The evil plot made sense up to a point. I guess I don't know enough about that region to judge whether the scheme actually made financial sense.

But I do love Daniel Craig as Bond.

I rewatched Casino Royale today, and just coming out of seeing QoS I saw things I never understood before, and that I couldn't have without that second movie. Which was very cool.

I want to see QoS again to see if what I didn't see was actually there, and just because Daniel Craig.

My mom and I watched Casino Royale again last night, and then went to see QoS today. The rewatch was beneficial for both of us, and I think it was far more a "sequel" than other Bond films seem to be. I liked the resolution of the whole arc, and I thought QoS moved a little faster. (Though it did seem like a collection of fights/chases pasted together with angst.)

Also, continue to love me some Judy Dench. (I don't think that's really a spoiler?)

But I do love Daniel Craig as Bond.

Well, yes. That is awesome. And Judy Dench! Man, I want a movie that focuses entirely on M, with Bond as the secondary character.

I just watched The Fall. It was beautifully shot, and Lee Pace is always a joy to watch. And the little girl didn't annoy me as much as small children often do in movies. The bit with Lee's character using Alexandra to score him his drugs bothered me, but then it was probably supposed to. Worth two hours and the time it took to look for it on Netflix.