successfully transitioning from one to the other requires more than frame by frame reproduction.
See also: Sin City.
'Out Of Gas'
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
successfully transitioning from one to the other requires more than frame by frame reproduction.
See also: Sin City.
Thank you, Jess for articulating EXACTLY what I was thinking (and what I am fearing).
See also what drove me crazy about some of the craxier LotR critics (however the story changes played out as a movie or not for me personally) screaming about being unfaithful to Tolkien.
See also: Sin City
I was avoiding that one, because I hadn't read the source, and enjoyed the movie. But with 300, I kept hearing about how apart from some of the Lena Headey political/waiting at home stuff (which I enjoyed more than a lot of the other parts of the movie), the rest was practically frame-by-frame true to the comic. And I just couldn't believe how horrifically fatuous it all was.
I agree it's a limiting criticism, and not just for comic book adaptations. Would you apply it to the adaptation of the Godfather? Mann's Last of the Mohicans? Stanley Kubrick's version of The Shining?* I don't understand the necessity of slavishly reproducing something that already exists.
*Eyes Wide Shut, on the other hand, is incredibly faithful to the source, FWIW.
See also what drove me crazy about some of the craxier LotR critics (however the story changes played out as a movie or not for me personally) screaming about being unfaithful to Tolkien.
I'll cop to being one of the purists with regard to Eowyn's big dramatic revelation, but really, how much more screentime would five extra sentences by Miranda Otto have stolen away from all the CGI of vast armies massing and Legolas surfing down elephants' trunks?
I'll cop to being one of the purists with regard to Eowyn's big dramatic revelation
Sigh, yes. They would have had time if they'd dumped some of Arwen's stuff t still not over my Arwen issues
The most faithful book-to-movie adaptation I've ever seen is Battlefield Earth. Watching the film was exactly like reading the book.
The most faithful book-to-movie adaptation I've ever seen is Battlefield Earth. Watching the film was exactly like reading the book.
Reading the book makes you feel horrifically embarrassed for Forest Whitaker?
I just saw The Dark Knight. I thought it was okay, but I wish I'd seen it sooner, so I wouldn't have had so much build-up time. It was neither as dark or as powerful as I had been led to believe. I'm going back to read the white-font.
Reading the book makes you feel horrifically embarrassed for Forest Whitaker?
Reading that book made me feel horribly embarrassed for all humanity, and therefore by extension, Forrest Whitaker.
quester, I was coming in here to post just about the same thing. I thought there were too many explosions and not nearly enough plot. I thought the first one was far superior.