Finally saw
Across the Universe
yesterday. I'm pretty sure I liked it. Parts of it didn't work exactly, and I did some confused blinking at certain plot points, but I liked the feel and the random Scenes of the Trippy. Also, it turns out I haven't heard an awful lot of Beatles songs.
Evan Rachel Wood is still a good actress, though she didn't get to showcase her awesomeness as much in this as in some of her previous films. The dude who played her British boy was also pretty great, with some of the same charm that Ewan brought to Moulin Rouge.
All the lost footage has been found and is included in the new director's cut of Blade Runner. Ridley Scott answers The Question in no uncertain terms in this NYT article.
I always thought the film works better thematically if the opposite were true.
I thought the film works best if the question is never answered. The distinction becomes meaningless as sufficiently-advanced technology becomes indistinguishable from magic, you know?
Also, Ridley Scott is approaching Lucasfilm levels of tinkering. Let's hope no cute furry beasts show up in the new version.
So this is, what, the eleven millionth version of Blade Runner on DVD now? What's next, just releasing the dailies as a 15-disc special edition?
On a similar note, I hate Disney's "available for a limited time" bullshit. But I may have to break down and buy
The Jungle Book
when it comes out this week. I do love that movie.
The ambiguity works much better thematicaly, I agree.
So this is, what, the eleven millionth version of Blade Runner on DVD now? What's next, just releasing the dailies as a 15-disc special edition?
Let's hope it never reaches that point.
Can't say that I wouldn't like to see the new levels of digital restoration, I just don't know what more he can add. Unless it's ewoks.
He's going to take out the guns and replace them with walkie-talkies.
Also, Ridley Scott is approaching Lucasfilm levels of tinkering. Let's hope no cute furry beasts show up in the new version.
Unicorns
have hair rather than fur, right?