Kaylee: So how many fell madly in love with you and wanted to take you away from all this? Inara: Just the one. I think I'm slipping.

'Serenity'


Natter 52: Playing with a full deck?  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Cashmere - Jul 20, 2007 8:47:30 am PDT #9148 of 10001
Now tagless for your comfort.

Talk about conflicted feelings. I'm torn between being glad Bush is getting a little back of what he's giving to the American people and terrified of Darth Cheney being in charge.


Matt the Bruins fan - Jul 20, 2007 8:48:18 am PDT #9149 of 10001
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand

Seriously paperdol, to that sort of person who's desperately seeking to improve her self-image by tearing down someone else's, being ignored and dismissed is FAR worse than being argued with.

If I were a malicious person (oh, wait. I AM) I would suggest continuing to post in the forum in normal, even-tempered tones while ignoring her and imagine her seething more and more as she fails to get any further response from you.


shrift - Jul 20, 2007 8:51:16 am PDT #9150 of 10001
"You can't put a price on the joy of not giving a shit." -Zenkitty

Roommate and I have both ordered copies of HP7. We're not sure what we're going to do if one arrives significantly earlier than the other.


§ ita § - Jul 20, 2007 8:57:08 am PDT #9151 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

We're not sure what we're going to do if one arrives significantly earlier than the other.

Cage fight!

I found the Rite Aid on the way in.

I don't care if people laugh at me tomorrow.


Burrell - Jul 20, 2007 8:59:53 am PDT #9152 of 10001
Why did Darth Vader cross the road? To get to the Dark Side!

tommyrot is scaring me with his Bush links this morning. Can't we just impeach him?

In better news for the day, dropping off the kids went very well, and later I'm going to see an old college friend of mine who is visiting from Germany.


tommyrot - Jul 20, 2007 9:01:48 am PDT #9153 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

tommyrot is scaring me with his Bush links this morning. Can't we just impeach him?

But I don't wanna be impeached!


shrift - Jul 20, 2007 9:01:53 am PDT #9154 of 10001
"You can't put a price on the joy of not giving a shit." -Zenkitty

Cage fight!

Ha! Probably more like, "Take this book, go to your room, shut the door, DON'T MAKE ANY NOISE, and most importantly, don't come out at any point to stare at me and make flaily hands. Okay? Okay."


Nora Deirdre - Jul 20, 2007 9:02:29 am PDT #9155 of 10001
I’m responsible for my own happiness? I can’t even be responsible for my own breakfast! (Bojack Horseman)

I have been reading a little on the latest Bush shenanigans and I have to say I agree with Glenn Greenwald in Salon:

I confess some difficulty here in becoming particularly outraged over this latest theory. There is nothing new here. As has long been known, this administration believes themselves to reside above and beyond the reach of the law. What else would they need to do in order to make that as clear as can be? They got caught red-handed committing multiple felonies -- by eavesdropping on Americans in precisely the way the law we enacted 30 years ago prohibited -- and they not only admitted it, but vowed to continue to break our laws, and asserted the right to do so. And nothing happened.

This latest assertion of power -- to literally block U.S. Attorneys from prosecuting executive branch employees -- is but another reflection of the lawlessness prevailing in our country, not a new revelation. We know the administration breaks laws with impunity and believes it can. That is no longer in question. The only real question is what, if anything, we are willing to do about that.

Yes, it is true that, as various Democratic statements are claiming, this theory poses a constitutional crisis since, yet again, the President declares the other two branches of government impotent and himself omnipotent. But we have had such a crisis for the last five years. We have just chosen to ignore it, to acquiesce to it, to allow it to fester.

There is no magic force that is going to descend from the sky and strike with lighting at George Bush and Dick Cheney for so flagrantly subverting our constitutional order. The Founders created various checks for confronting tyrannical abuses of power, but they have to be activated by political will and the courage to confront it. That has been lacking. Hence, they have seized omnipotent powers with impunity.

At this point, the blame rests not with the Bush administration. They have long made clear what they believe and, especially, what they are. They have been rubbing in our faces for several years the fact that they believe they can ignore the law and do what they want because nobody is willing to do anything about it. Thus far, they have been right, and the blame rests with those who have acquiesced to it.


§ ita § - Jul 20, 2007 9:07:00 am PDT #9156 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I'm afraid I'd totally do the stare'n'flail, shrift. Not out of malice...just because I couldn't stop myself.


shrift - Jul 20, 2007 9:09:43 am PDT #9157 of 10001
"You can't put a price on the joy of not giving a shit." -Zenkitty

And that is why I would include it in the instructions ahead of time. Because it wouldn't be malicious, but I'd still want to strangle you for it, you know?