Lorne: You know what they say about people who need people. Connor: They're the luckiest people in the world. Lorne: You been sneaking peeks at my Streisand collection again, Kiddo? Connor: Just kinda popped out.

'Time Bomb'


Natter 52: Playing with a full deck?  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


§ ita § - Jun 18, 2007 12:30:25 pm PDT #3655 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

While we're on the topic of freaky clothing: ick. Then again, I already dislike flipflops and am not a fan of fur.

That's just gotta tickle, and in the end? Not warm enough.


beekaytee - Jun 18, 2007 12:31:15 pm PDT #3656 of 10001
Compassionately intolerant

Then the silver jumpsuit.

Um. This one might take a while. I have a policy regarding shiny clothes based on the fact that they NEVER flatter on the red carpet. Plus, the jumpsuit is going to have to wait until I walk off a bit more of this enormous ass-o-mine. But, when the time is right, baybee, I'm totally there in a very Space 1999 way, if you know what I mean.


§ ita § - Jun 18, 2007 12:32:13 pm PDT #3657 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I loved those crazy Moonbase Alpha clothes. Better than most of the trek stuff, for sure.


Sheryl - Jun 18, 2007 12:37:56 pm PDT #3658 of 10001
Fandom means never having to say "But where would I wear that?"

Timelies all!

I'm kinda amused by the discussion of imagined future fashions, since G's current Netflix disk is U.F.O. which is very much in that style...purple wigs and all.


Tom Scola - Jun 18, 2007 12:40:54 pm PDT #3659 of 10001
Remember that the frontier of the Rebellion is everywhere. And even the smallest act of insurrection pushes our lines forward.

U.F.O. paid a lot of attention to fashion in the future. some of it pretty decent, some not so much.

[edit: more here: [link] ]


§ ita § - Jun 18, 2007 12:41:38 pm PDT #3660 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Any chance that second locale is a gay bar?


Toddson - Jun 18, 2007 12:43:19 pm PDT #3661 of 10001
Friends don't let friends read "Atlas Shrugged"

my eyes! my eyes! oh for the sanity and good taste of a purple pageboy and a silver body suit!


Ginger - Jun 18, 2007 1:13:16 pm PDT #3662 of 10001
"It didn't taste good. It tasted soooo horrible. It tasted like....a vodka martini." - Matilda

Fox, CBS refuse condomless pig ad: [link]

In a written response to Trojan, though, Fox said that it had rejected the spot because, “Contraceptive advertising must stress health-related uses rather than the prevention of pregnancy.”


Jesse - Jun 18, 2007 1:17:44 pm PDT #3663 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

@@

On a related note, I know someone who does consumer research for Church & Dwight (the parent company), and he had a hilarious story about doing a focus group for players -- men who "date" several times a week.


§ ita § - Jun 18, 2007 1:17:49 pm PDT #3664 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

“We always find it funny that you can use sex to sell jewelry and cars, but you can’t use sex to sell condoms,”

How true, how true.

I didn't know but just learnt of the existence of condoms marketed towards women, which I think is a perfectly cromulent idea. Of course, not if it's as twee as the condom cases marketed towards women.