If you constantly have to yank your top up, it is not appropriate for office wear.

If you constantly have to adjust a piece of clothing it is not appropriate for you to wear. period. (So Sayeth the Tim Gunn!...I actually have a cute sweater with a keyhole that I know I adjust quite a bit because I'm sure the hole has drifted too low and my bra is peeking out. But I love the sweater and I will not give it up. I also don't wear it to work.)

If there is other intelligent life in the universe, why haven't we heard from them? This question is known as the Fermi Paradox. Here's a fairly new possible explanation for the paradox:

This is the Great Temptation for any technological species — to shape their subjective reality to provide the cues of survival and reproductive success without the substance. Most bright alien species probably go extinct gradually, allocating more time and resources to their pleasures, and less to their children.

...

Technology is fairly good at controlling external reality to promote our real biological fitness, but it’s even better at delivering fake fitness — subjective cues of survival and reproduction, without the real-world effects. Fresh organic fruit juice costs so much more than nutrition-free soda. Having real friends is so much more effort than watching Friends on TV. Actually colonizing the galaxy would be so much harder than pretending to have done it when filming Star Wars or Serenity.

Thus Miller’s answer to the Fermi Paradox — SETI won’t work because alien civilizations are all addicted to computer games and runaway consumerism. Why even attempt communication with actual beings (who are in any case quite difficult to reach and perhaps impossible to understand), when you can create a virtual reality that’s so much more malleable and responsive to your needs? That’s a dark view indeed, but we’ve a long way to go before drawing any serious conclusions about Fermi’s ‘Where are they?’ question.

[link]

Maybe the first intelligent species in the universe did look for other intelligent life, but since they were the first, they didn't find any, so they gave up. Then when the second intelligent species arrived, they couldn't find the first species (because of the having given up already) so they gave up too. And so on and so on....

SO glad my office is super-casual. I wear jeans every. single. day. AIFG! I don't think I could ever go back to office gear.

SO glad my office is super-casual.

Me too. I hate wearing ties.

SO glad my office is super-casual. I wear jeans every. single. day. AIFG! I don't think I could ever go back to office gear.

I have NO idea what the dress code, if there is one, will be at my new office. I am only the second woman they've hired though and they seem to really need me so I'm not that worried about it. I'm going to continue to dress the way I always do.

Offhand, I'd say anything you have to adjust shouldn't be worn to the office, especially strapless tops of any sort. Aside from propriety, a lot of offices are aggressively air conditioned and the wearer will be cold.

And most places that ban t-shirts won't mind a nice t-shirt type top - I think it's the (1) undershirt type t-shirt and (2) ones with pictures or sayings on them that will be objectionable.

My workplace has no dress code that I'm aware of, but I always wear nice jeans (no holes or obvious fraying), nice shirts (not t-shirts), and flats (instead of tennis shoes or flip-flops). So I feel dressier than most around here.

My workplace has a list of prohibited items (sweats, tank/tube/etc. tops, ripped jeans, cutoff shorts) but otherwise is on the casual side of business casual. For instance, I'm in shorts today (and wish I wasn't since it never got as warm as it was supposed to).

Tube tops or other strapless tops at the office, yes or no? Even if they're under an unbuttoned cardigan?

Yeah, I'm going to say no. I'm not crazy about sleeveless at all to work, and I know I'm way in the minority on that one. (although under something I guess it's fine)

is flinging a human 100 ft with a trebuchet an obviously bad idea?

Or merely an idea whose time has come?

It all depends on the landing zone.