Tep, 'Tec has a nice retro look to it.

The ones I found in Half-Price Books weren't old like, 1993 old. They were old, like 1963 old. Must go back tomorrow.

Tasty Titans.

But that's just Tim/Kon.

Ahem. Other Titans of Tasty, past and present:

Dick/Roy (kickin' it with the Old Skool HAWT)

Heh. The issue of New Teen Titans I got today had not only Dick being all broody and I-Must-Leave, but Roy was *also* leaving, saying he had to go take care of the crackheads, or something like that.

In retrospect, he was probably just following Dick out the door for some superhero lovin'....

Bart/Kon (when the Batboy's away, the freaks will play)

Dude, Bart is SO not sexual!

Dude, Bart is SO not sexual!

I've read the WHOLE run of Impulse, plus all of YJ, plus all of TT (this version), plus, alarmingly enough, the entire Wally West run of Flash, and ya huh! Is so! But only really with Kon since Carol, despite the weird Arrowette flirtation. But he's innocently sexual, which makes sense in my head.

I read a Wally/Bart sex pollen story the other day...

I'll give the questions a shot, although Team Titans is about my least favorite Titans era, including the end of the recent run before the current one.

In Team Titans and there are characters I don't really know about. Like Pantha. And who's "Baby"?

The Team Titans themselves are from an alternate future which was wiped out during "Zero Hour," except for Mirage and Terra, who are from the time and current reality, which really took them by surprise. It's been hinted strongly that Terra is actually the former Titan of the same name and appearance who betrayed the Titans, but she remembers none of that.

I know nothing about Pantha. She was one of a bunch of new members that showed up and weren't very interesting. "Baby" is the Wildebeast, a creation of a terrorist organization of the same name, who attached himself to Pantha.

Then there's an issue where Donna Troy turned into a 50ft goddess but then was changed back with her husband and her son?

Uh...OK. What's the question, exactly? (And Donna and her husband, Terry, divorced, and eventually he and the kid died, offpanel, in a car accident, while she was dating Green Lantern.)

Who is Mirage and what's her deal with Nightwing and Starfire?

Mirage's full story hasn't been revealed yet, but she thought she was from the alternate future, where she was involved somehow with an older Dick Grayson, or some such, who was then corrupted by Trigon and raped her. It's all pretty much a mess.

Really old Detective Comics? Was there a #27 in there, by any chance? ;-)

Tomorrow: Bats, Batgirl, Astounding? Right?

Astounishing, remember. Got to keep the typo going.

I have a pretty heavy pull list today:

Batman #630 - finishing up Winick's run - until he becomes the regular writer after "War Games" is over.
Batgirl #54 - I imagine this will have heavy foreshadowing of the "War Games" storyline.
Catwoman #33 - This, too, will probably have WG implications, since there will be a Mafia confrontation.

Superman #207 - I think the run has been interesting, and as always, Lee's art is great.
Superman:Birthright #12 - finishing up the (new) re-boot of Superman's origin. Should be a busy issue, as there seems to be a lot to wrap up.

DC: The New Frontier #5 - Darwyn Cooke's take on the dawn of the Silver Age, pre-Crisis, entering its penultimate issue. Expensive as hell ($6.95 for 64 pgs (no ads, I think)), but I think its been worth it.

JLA #102 - Why, why did they let Chuck Austen on this title? This issue focuses on the Flash, so I'm hoping for the best, but basically holding out for #107, when Kurt Busiek begins his run.

There are others, (GL #179, The Losers, Sleeper). Don't forget the Planetary #20 comes out this week, too.

Over on the Marvel side, I find that I have 4 titles that I'm pulling:

Astounishing #3, of course.
Powers #2, also of course.
Ultimate Fantastic Four #9
Avengers #500 - although Marvel's stupid numbering (see below) changes insults the reader, I'm going to get this one just to see what Bendis does in Disassembling the team.

(Re: The numbering of Avengers - This title is on its third or fourth volume, and this issue should be numbered #85. However, Marvel has changed the numbering back to what it would be if they continued nubmering from the very first issue of Avengers #1, vol. 1. Fine, I can kind of live with that, but it does allow Marvel to market this issue as a special "anniversary" issue and raise the price. They did this for Fantastic Four and The Amazing Spider-Man, as well. What makes this even more insulting, though, is that Marvel is going to let Avenger go to #503, then re-launch the title YET AGAIN, to get a new #1 issue. It certainly is reminiscent of the early '90s, when new #1 issues came out frequently to pump up sales to speculators/collectors, and which ultimately led to a collapse of the market. Not a good plan, IMHO.)

I was going to avoid the Catwoman. I guess there is no way.

But, I may have to limit my purchases today due to the very tight two days before payday budget.

I guess it *was* Detective Comics, but they looked really old. Hmmm.

Could be. Detective Comics is what put the "DC" in DC Comics.

Incidentally, if someone ever proposes a Detective Comics #1 relaunch, they should be strapped down and forced to watch Schumaker Batman movies forever.

I was going to avoid the Catwoman. I guess there is no way.

It's a decent title. Little iffy there a few issues back with the ree-cock-u-lous cult thing, but still a decent title.

I re-read the first two trades of this version recently, and they were still pretty enjoyable. (I got them back when I was only picking up trades of things, and wasn't as fully inside the DCU as I am now, so I wasn't sure if I'd still find them swell.)

It's a decent title. Little iffy there a few issues back with the ree-cock-u-lous cult thing, but still a decent title.

To tell the truth, it's much more like a crime story with superhero elements, rather than a straight superhero story (aside from that cult side-plot), which makes sense since Ed Brubaker writes it. Not at all related to the abomination that is the movie, and I hope that the movie's failure doesn't sink the book. (I do hear that Brubaker is going to end his run around #50, so who knows what will happen after that?)

Could be. Detective Comics is what put the "DC" in DC Comics.

Yes. The next issue is #797, and it is the second longest running title in comics.