It is -- sadly -- but isn't it bound to be better than the movie? I mean, it couldn't possibly be worse, right?
Other Media
Discussion of Buffy and Angel comics, books, and more. Please don't get into spoilery details in the first week of release.
It is -- sadly -- but isn't it bound to be better than the movie? I mean, it couldn't possibly be worse, right?
I don't know. I rarely ever like comic book novels.
Elizabeth Hand's original work is sometimes interesting, sometimes a trainwreck, sometimes an interesting trainwreck.
Her novelizations, I am told, are drek.
It is -- sadly -- but isn't it bound to be better than the movie? I mean, it couldn't possibly be worse, right?
Well, considering the movie is severing all ties to anything Batman related, I wouldn't seek it out as a Bat-novel.
How can a Catwoman movie have nothing to do with Batman?? Why call it Catwoman. Why not make a movie about...I dunno...Mistress Meow.
Call me (I'm on the right).... Mistress Meow!
How can a Catwoman movie have nothing to do with Batman?? Why call it Catwoman. Why not make a movie about...I dunno...Mistress Meow.
Because the executives have been digging into the monkey crack again?
The only thing I can see is that because they are doing a new Batman movie they want to avoid any confusion/link between the two.
That, or Halle demanded it for some reason.
I rarely ever like comic book novels.
I get a kick out of Elliot S! Maggin's stuff. His Superman books Last Son of Krypton and Miracle Monday are good cheesy fun. And his novelization of Kingdom Come was good as well.
It is -- sadly -- but isn't it bound to be better than the movie? I mean, it couldn't possibly be worse, right?
You've never read any of Alan Dean Foster's novellizations, have you?
You've never read any of Alan Dean Foster's novellizations, have you?
Damn you for those flashbacks, Sean! Damn you to the Hell of A Billion Hack Writers!