(My reaction to voice mail is usually "SCORE!")
Oh, yeah, plus a feeling akin to the commutation of a sentence.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
(My reaction to voice mail is usually "SCORE!")
Oh, yeah, plus a feeling akin to the commutation of a sentence.
I've been at my current company since 1994. I've been in my current job (minus a few job title upgrades that changed exactly 0 of my work) since 2000.
Apparently I set down roots.
Signed,
Lived in a tiny basement one-room for 9 years and a second-floor one-room for 5.
Do you get excited when you call someone and reach voice mail, or do you feel it just prolongs the whole experience?
I think it depends on why I'm calling. If I need to fix a problem, I want to reach a person. But I totally have been all "voice mail, SCORE!" on other less pressing matters.
I'll have been at this uni for 15 years as of June 1, and with the same doctor for all but four of them. And I need an escape hatch and an added 28% insanity buffer like WOAH.
Ha! Court strikes down Internet porn law.
I am now a wee bit less worried about NC17 stuff on my site.
I think it depends on why I'm calling. If I need to fix a problem, I want to reach a person. But I totally have been all "voice mail, SCORE!" on other less pressing matters.
For me, if I'm just looking for a non-urgent answer, voicemail is awesome, because they can can call back and leave it on my voicemail. Perfect!!
Although I'm making an active effort to get better at picking up the phone and calling people.
My reaction to voice mail is usually "SCORE!"
This is me unless I am calling the boys or DH. But mostly I really don't want you to answer the phone.
Tony Snow:
The executive branch is under no compulsion to testify to Congress, because Congress in fact doesn't have oversight ability.
That's, um, interesting.
That was in a rather heated discussion that Snow had with Harry Smith on CBS: [link]
"It is not reasonable for the government to expect all parents to shoulder the burden to cut off every possible source of adult content for their children, rather than the government's addressing the problem at its source," a government attorney, Peter D. Keisler, argued in a post-trial brief.
And exactly why isn't it reasonable to expect parents to be responsible for their own children? Last time I checked, that was kind of the point of being parents...
See, this is why you can't sell nudie magazines right there at the local newstand. Oh, wait....