which is vastly inferior because of its lowflowness.
low flows suck. or don't as the case may be. I had a high flow in my old apartment and my mother wanted to hire a plumber to come in and take the high flow toilet and replace it with her crappy low flow. Remember that ep of King of the Hill?
I've read about contractors scouring building demolition sites for high flow toilets. They're apparently worth their weight in gold in the plumbing business.
Hugs my high-flow toilet.
No, wait. That didn't come out right.
Yeah, Sarameg...Fayette Street is better than Hickey or Boys' Village. Jeez, the stuff I know. Candlelit restaurants, zero. Penal institutions, otoh...Ask me how.
(Well, actually, y'all don't have to.)
I need a new toilet in my master bathroom. I'm afraid of the cost and the low-flowiness.
The new low-flow toilets are really much better than the ones that gave low-flow a bad name. Mine flushes much better than my old, regular-flow toilet. I've had it about five years, and it was the Consumer Reports best buy at the time. It was surprisingly cheap.
My American Standard Low Flow is both attractive and functional. I wouldn't trade it for anything. Except perhaps the one that came out a year or two after I bought this one (bought in 2001, installed in 2004) that was a close repro to an actual 1920s American Standard.
Mine's an American Standard too. I love it as much as it's possible to love a toilet.
I have the Williamsburg (the original version). It rules. Even with my crummy old pipes, it takes a lot for it to get cranky on me.