I had no real plans but I think I'm going to go to the library this afternoon. (I was over at Readerville and somebody had posted the Edgar Award nominees and that inspired me to go see if I could find them.)
The Crying of Natter 49
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
I've eaten, and now I'm drawing a map. And thinking about bandaging my knee, but I'm flightily easily distracted. Especially about things that aren't uncomfortable.
Having read up on mitral valve prolapse I'm pretty sure that if I had it, it'd have come up on my recent workup. However, that reminded me that the reason I had the workup was to be sure I could be on Cymbalta safely, since it has arrhythmia side effects. That could be what I'm experiencing. My dose was upped a couple weeks ago.
Will bring up with migraine doc next week, and meanwhile just ignore the unpleasantness.
Oh, love the My Name is Earl shenanigans!
Muppet just came up to me and tried mightily to convince me it was time to feed the cats. Five hours early. Either she really thinks I'm stupid, or she's really stupid. Or both.
Photo experts, I need your help. I just had two rolls of film developed and every single picture was grainy [link] and washed out [link] This is two rolls of film taken over a year but every picture looked just about this bad-- is this the fault of the photo developing place or did something happen to my film? I'm sure both rolls went through an airport baggage xray at some point.
Was it the carry-on x-ray or the one for checked baggage? The carry-on one is safe for film, but the checked baggage one generally isn't.
t edit: though that doesn't look like the sort of damage that x-rays will generally do -- most x-ray-damaged pictures I've seen have been more streaky than grainy.
OK, I just looked it up, and that looks exactly like the sort of "x-ray fog" that the newer kinds of checked-baggage screening machines can do. The damaged negatives that I'd seen before were from the older kind of equipment.
Always the checked baggage one.
OK, I just looked it up, and that looks exactly like the sort of "x-ray fog" that the newer kinds of checked-baggage screening machines can do. The damaged negatives that I'd seen before were from the older kind of equipment.
Ugh. I had no idea it was that bad; I hadn't seen it this bad before. Guess it's time to go digital!
It can't be fixed after developing.
General rule for film is, unless you have absolutely no choice, don't put undeveloped film into a checked bag. If you must, then put it in a lead bag. (Which will always get your bag searched -- my bag was a mess after going through several international airports with a lead bag of film.)
Film is just about always fine in the carry-on scanners. If you want to be totally paranoid about it, you can put the film in a lead bag inside a carry-on -- the security people get a bit annoyed at that, but you can be totally sure that it's safe.