Got a question about technology? Ask it here. Discussion of hardware, software, TiVos, multi-region DVDs, Windows, Macs, LINUX, hand-helds, iPods, anything tech related. Better than any helpdesk!
I should point out that my pre-coffee reponse up there left out the fact that we have a digital converter box, and have for a few years. I tend to forget the thing isn't part of the actual TV.
So if it's got a remote, it's a digital TV?
Is the difference between a coaxial connection and a converter box? I'd guess that if you have to connect your antenna to the TV with a standard screwdriver, you've got an analog connection.
So if it's got a remote, it's a digital TV?
Nope.
In theory, once they start selling converter boxes as more than a speciality item this year, with the FCC $40 coupon, it'll be about $10-$20 to get a box so that any old TV can get a digital signal.
I was told, third hand, by tech support that the Gateways I wanted to get for my classroom will not work on the network (Internet, Lotus notes, network drives), and that I should get one of a list of twice-as-expensive IBMs. This smells funny to me, but I want to confirm that it really is bullshit before I call Bullshit and talk to Tech Support directly.
Sounds like bullshit. Now, it may be that your support group has some kind of service contract that they want/need to deal with, but all the stuff on your list can be done with pretty much any internet-capable machine.
So if it's got a remote, it's a digital TV?
Not by default no - sorry, I should have been more clear. What I was trying to say (badly) was that almost all new (or even not-that-new) TVs already have the capability to decode digital off-air signals. Most people will not have to buy new TVs.
(And that's if the digital switch actually happens on schedule - this is the what, third time it's been pushed back? Fourth?)
Thanks.
I'm going to choose to believe that the digital thing is the cover story for a conspiracy...now to figure out that conspiracy it's covering up...