Under Track Changes, there's an Accept All Changes option.
My heart expands / 'tis grown a bulge in't / inspired by / your beauty effulgent.
William ,'Conversations with Dead People'
Buffistechnology 3: "Press Some Buttons, See What Happens."
Got a question about technology? Ask it here. Discussion of hardware, software, TiVos, multi-region DVDs, Windows, Macs, LINUX, hand-helds, iPods, anything tech related. Better than any helpdesk!
Ginger - Sep 18, 2007 11:26:30 am PDT #2778 of 25501
"It didn't taste good. It tasted soooo horrible. It tasted like....a vodka martini." - Matilda
Sue - Sep 18, 2007 11:29:48 am PDT #2779 of 25501
hip deep in pie
Sophia, it sounds like the logo was probably created with a resolution meant for screen viewing, which is (I think 72 dpi) and that isn't always great for printing.
I don't understand why you and your boss print it out differently though. Could it be your boss just has a crappy printer or low-res settings on her printer?
Sophia Brooks - Sep 18, 2007 11:32:35 am PDT #2780 of 25501
Cats to become a rabbit should gather immediately now here
Sophia, it sounds like the logo was probably created with a resolution meant for screen viewing, which is (I think 72 dpi) and that isn't always great for printing.
Thank you so much
That is what I thought too, but then it happened even with the files the designer gave us that are for offset printing!
I ended up googling, and coming up with a blog where someone mentioned that outlook 2003 assumes all images are 96 dpi, and actually enlarges them to that size, thus pixelateing them. I linked above
Sue - Sep 18, 2007 11:32:42 am PDT #2781 of 25501
hip deep in pie
Thanks Ginger.
tommyrot - Sep 18, 2007 5:28:55 pm PDT #2782 of 25501
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
I don't mess around with shell stuff too much in OS X, but I found something interesting that lets you grab web stuff using the command line. You'd call it like:
/usr/local/bin/links -dump "http://somewebpage.com"
What is this 'links' thing? I don't have that file (at least at that location).
mothra - Sep 18, 2007 6:18:42 pm PDT #2783 of 25501
Mothra, benevolent winged goddess, protector of the earth.
What do we know about Go-Daddy? I'm thinking of using them to renew my domain name, mostly because I detest Network Solutions and they're LOTS cheaper.
Typo Boy - Sep 18, 2007 6:51:23 pm PDT #2784 of 25501
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.
I use them - for domains they are fine. Don't let them talk you into using their hosting service. In general when you buy from them they try a fairly hard sell to get you to buy other services; ignore this and they are great for domains as far as I'm concerned.
I'm not the only one. I think several people on this board uses go-daddy. But you might also check your hosting service. A lot of hosting services offer domains at competitive prices.
Liese S. - Sep 18, 2007 7:34:42 pm PDT #2785 of 25501
"Faded like the lilac, he thought."
I agree with Typo. I also use them for domains and domains only and have been happy with them in that aspect. But I would not use them for hosting.
Jon B. - Sep 19, 2007 1:48:29 am PDT #2786 of 25501
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
go-daddy are fine. I use dotster who are also good.
I used to use network solutions and I remember them making it very very VERY difficult for me to leave them. This was 5 years ago; hopefully things are different now.
Tom Scola - Sep 19, 2007 2:14:51 am PDT #2787 of 25501
Remember that the frontier of the Rebellion is everywhere. And even the smallest act of insurrection pushes our lines forward.
/usr/local/bin/links -dump "http://somewebpage.com"
Anything in /usr/local is something that has been installed locally on that system. It's not something that comes with Mac OS X.
You can get it here: [link]