I like pancakes 'cause they're stackable. Ooo, and waffles 'cause you can put things in the little holes if you wanted to.

Buffy ,'Potential'


Buffistechnology 3: "Press Some Buttons, See What Happens."

Got a question about technology? Ask it here. Discussion of hardware, software, TiVos, multi-region DVDs, Windows, Macs, LINUX, hand-helds, iPods, anything tech related. Better than any helpdesk!


§ ita § - Dec 18, 2012 7:19:53 am PST #21692 of 25501
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Aha. I did some reading:

We are not censoring any adult content, and want to show users exactly what they are looking for -- but we aim not to show sexually-explicit results unless a user is specifically searching for them. We use algorithms to select the most relevant results for a given query. If you're looking for adult content, you can find it without having to change the default setting -- you just may need to be more explicit in your query if your search terms are potentially ambiguous. The image search settings now work the same way as in Web search.

This seems to mean that if I search "cock", I'll get only birds. And if I search "cock porn" I'll get big hard dick. But what about the search that would have returned birds and penises? How do I specify that one? "Cock rooster porn"? But isn't that me informing the search? Sometimes I just want to know what the results are.


tommyrot - Dec 18, 2012 7:29:41 am PST #21693 of 25501
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

x-posty. (Yeah, 10 minutes after your post.)

I don't recall their rationale (I just skimmed the article).

Probably "to protect users from themselves" and/or "avoid controversy for google."

Dunno about text searches.


§ ita § - Dec 18, 2012 10:08:23 am PST #21694 of 25501
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I had no idea before that that the text searches were being censored either. Why do they pretend, then, that Safesearch is a real thing? Or, rather, that the absence of Safesearch is what it might simply imply?

So, basically, that makes it sound like if I don't know there are nudes of...Kim Kardashian, searching her name won't get me them--I have to know they're there before I look for them.

Why would I not want to switch search engines knowing that? It's not that I'm looking for porn--I'm just looking to be able to ask all the questions.


§ ita § - Dec 18, 2012 12:57:43 pm PST #21695 of 25501
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Where does one find development talent for an inchoate project? Like, someone has an idea for a graphical application on a few platforms, what's the best way to find reliable skilled developers outside of a traditional employment opportunity?


Calli - Dec 18, 2012 1:00:16 pm PST #21696 of 25501
I must obey the inscrutable exhortations of my soul—Calvin and Hobbs

Heh. So, yes, I tried Google search on "cock" and mostly got birds. "Cock porn" produced some genitalia, some naked women, and a head shot of Misha Collins as Cas, looking perplexed. Yes, really.


Typo Boy - Dec 18, 2012 1:03:48 pm PST #21697 of 25501
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.

I sometimes use Duckduckgo for text searches. The problem is they don't really have the equivalent for scholar or of googles image search. Also their special features are all hidden under submenus of the goodies menu which is under "more" which does not strike me as good interface design. But for plain vanilla text searches they seem to be good.


omnis_audis - Dec 18, 2012 1:05:27 pm PST #21698 of 25501
omnis, pursue. That's an order from a shy woman who can use M-16. - Shir

I would try duckduckgo web search.

ETA:

Ha! Slow x-post!


§ ita § - Dec 18, 2012 1:18:49 pm PST #21699 of 25501
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Yeah, I don't have any Cas in my cock porn. A lot of penises, no Castiel.

If duckduckgo doesn't do image searching, then it's not that useful to me. About 1/3 of my searching is image searching, not including reverse (that's maybe another 1/4?). I'll check Bing.


omnis_audis - Dec 20, 2012 1:17:07 pm PST #21700 of 25501
omnis, pursue. That's an order from a shy woman who can use M-16. - Shir

OK, this is a curiosity if ever there was one. It's a MacBook Pro, about 2.5 years old. Running 10.6.8. 2.4GHz Intel Core i5 with 8GB of RAM. I have an external monitor hooked up, so I can spread the paperwork across two screens (or have the tools on one screen, and the project on the other). When I boot the sucker, the external screen does not come up. If I unplug it, and plug it back in, it still comes up as power light green (getting signal) but nothing on the screen. If I close the lid to the laptop, and let it go to sleep for 5-10 minutes, then open up the lid, the external monitor pops on like it's always been there. If I close the lid, and try to awake it too soon, neither screen comes on. If I put the machine to sleep via the apple menu, then wake it up, the external screen stays off as described above.

Any clues what might be going on there? Or how to resolve it? It's rather annoying. Not critical or anything. Just annoying.


Toddson - Dec 21, 2012 10:23:22 am PST #21701 of 25501
Friends don't let friends read "Atlas Shrugged"

This seems like the place to ask ... I've never used anything but Windows (you can stamp my Luddite/masochist card now) but I got a $300 Apple gift card.

What do I buy? recommendations? advice? ... envy?