Hah, I cannot help, because I totally always just look up the one regex I need at the moment.
Ilona Costa Bianchi ,'The Girl in Question'
Buffistechnology 3: "Press Some Buttons, See What Happens."
Got a question about technology? Ask it here. Discussion of hardware, software, TiVos, multi-region DVDs, Windows, Macs, LINUX, hand-helds, iPods, anything tech related. Better than any helpdesk!
I feel bad. I worked out three different regexes, when technically there is one that will do it, and...I'm gonna forget that shit. But I recorded it, so at least that's not last.
And you want to know what it was for? To extract every link to a JPG in the SPN thread, because I needed to find the right one, and paging through was just not working, and search was fruitless.
So...great power.
But I must practice. Good text editors will encourage that.
Bwah.
Make that into a sellable product, and you will have millions.
Assuming you've saved the thread in a file called "Supernatural.html", this will work:
$ perl -0777 -ne '@x = /href=.(.*?\\.jpg)/g; print join("\\n", @x)' Supernatural.html
That's not precisely what I did--I didn't just grab the http string, I grabbed the entire <a href=" link so it would be clickable html in the output (I did a regexp find all, copy then paste), I just didn't realise that some people used single quotes and some used none at all, so I ended up going back for more. And then the resulting file was pretty illegible onscreen, so I had to insert t li in there tidy it up and make it followable.
But your command line is a good example of the one liners I've been avoiding paying enough attention to in order to remember--it's not like it's a physical pain, or anything.
The Apple v Samsung verdict is being read now: [link]
Given the complexity of the task, a verdict back this soon is shocking. Some 700 individual decisions needed to be made for the jury to finish its job.
To recap, this jury hasn't asked a single question since Wednesday. It hasn't asked for clarification on a single element of jury instructions, it hasn't asked to have any testimony re-read.... nothing.
So basically Apple won everything.
All right.
I'd love it if this inspires Samsung to do some more serious innovation (like the Note! I kind of want one, but haven't been impressed by the software available for it yet) but I hope we don't see Apple pursuing more battles against Android entire. I'll admit that Android borrows a lot of interface elements from iOS, but Apple has taken their fair share back at this point and I hope they decide to let it go.
Though honestly...my next phone might be a Windows phone? I'll have to look into the apps store when the time comes, but if they do a good job attracting developers post-Windows-8, it has some serious potential in my eyes. Especially as I use a traditional tablet PC at work and would love some solid integration. And nobody can say that interface looks anything like iOS.
after I saw some of the exhibits online, I was wondering why Samsung thought they could win (or not lose). It seemed so blatant to me.
I have a Samsung Exhibit! I figured all Android phones were like that. I'm confused about Apple's claims. No one else is allowed to double-tap zoom or one-finger scroll? Those seem like basic functionalities.