So which (or do both?) of those two models do that?
Buffistechnology 3: "Press Some Buttons, See What Happens."
Got a question about technology? Ask it here. Discussion of hardware, software, TiVos, multi-region DVDs, Windows, Macs, LINUX, hand-helds, iPods, anything tech related. Better than any helpdesk!
Just the second, it looks like.
Maybe I'll ask Crutchfield. They have excellent customer service.
I chatted with someone at Crutchfield, and it's actually the first that's an LCD with LED backlighting. According to them, so-called "LED TVs" are actually just LCD TVs that use an LED backlight instead of the standard fluorescent one. This model, for example, which seems to be the 40" version of my second link above, clearly mentions fluorescent backlighting.
I'm pretty happy with my LG LCD tv, which I've had for 2 years. (This one: [link] ) I'm not a serious AV connoisseur, but I've had no technical problems, the picture's consistently clear and crisp, and the sound is good (n.b., I'm deaf in one ear, so if there's any sort of balance issue, I'm not the one to catch it).
Why can't IE run javascript every other browser can? Or rather is there a way to get rid of every version of IE before 9? Sigh.
Heh. I was just about to ask that same question about Safari....
Can anyone think of a reason why Quicktime 10.1 would be telling me a video has a bitrate of 4.3Mbps (double what it should be) and Quicktime 10.0 is telling me 2.3Mbps (what I'd encoded it at)???
I need to give a client an answer more technical than "Quicktime 10 is fucked up, I don't even."
I am living this xkcd right now: [link]
Can anyone think of a reason why Quicktime 10.1 would be telling me a video has a bitrate of 4.3Mbps (double what it should be) and Quicktime 10.0 is telling me 2.3Mbps (what I'd encoded it at)???
One's a mono-rate and the other stereo?