Look, you got a little stabbed the other day. That's bound to make anyone a mite ornery.

Mal ,'Ariel'


Buffistechnology 3: "Press Some Buttons, See What Happens."

Got a question about technology? Ask it here. Discussion of hardware, software, TiVos, multi-region DVDs, Windows, Macs, LINUX, hand-helds, iPods, anything tech related. Better than any helpdesk!


§ ita § - Feb 21, 2012 11:41:07 am PST #19520 of 25501
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Anything wrong with the official Google Reader app? I just use that.

Because it's not one of the top whatever results when you search for rss reader?


Gris - Feb 21, 2012 12:52:39 pm PST #19521 of 25501
Hey. New board.

Weird. I find that pretty surprising, but I probably searched "Google Reader" since I knew I would want one that synced.

Ginger: I may yet do that, but since I want to make an individual "note" for every single problem - of which there are 10-20 in each file - attaching files isn't really useful. I don't even have digital copies of some of the files - they're old paper-only masters. I don't really want to use the program to store the actual information, just the tags along with enough information that I can look the problem up in my MathCounts binder.

I could absolutely hack Evernote (or Springpad, which I like a bit more) to do what I want, but it would just have a lot of overhead.


le nubian - Feb 21, 2012 1:28:32 pm PST #19522 of 25501
"And to be clear, I am the hell. And the high water."

Gris,

I must confess I don't know what you need.

Can't you do what you want in excel? Google spreadsheet? Do you want to pair the items with QR codes or something?

Do you need a database?


§ ita § - Feb 21, 2012 1:57:19 pm PST #19523 of 25501
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Has anyone here ever used anything like Sickbeard? I'm trying to work out its scope. I mean, can I use it on a login-only torrent site?


§ ita § - Feb 21, 2012 2:49:42 pm PST #19524 of 25501
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

This is a seriously interesting article (well, marginally interesting article with interesting comments) on automation. I understand that I basically suck, in that I've only partially automated torrent uPNP transcode solutions. Dammit.

But I think the guy who says their fridge SMSs is lying. LYING.


Typo Boy - Feb 21, 2012 2:55:57 pm PST #19525 of 25501
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.

A three file data base to create a many to many relationship would work but might be a bit of a pain.

Table Titles
title Id| title

Table Tags
Tag Id| Tag

Table Connector
Connection Id| Title Id | Tag Id

The first field in each table would be auto generated.

Maybe access could make a form to handle those tables that would not be too big a pain to fill in.

Many moons ago I had to do something on those lines In Visual Fox Pro, but I doubt anyone but a few people with legacy code use that any more.


Gris - Feb 21, 2012 4:25:41 pm PST #19526 of 25501
Hey. New board.

I absolutely could do it in a database. I could probably fake something just fine in Excel - in fact, I started to. But what I like about tagging, as implemented in... everything... is the type-it-and-forget-it simplicity.

I think I may actually use Evernote for REALS and copy the test questions in there, as images snipped from the PDF. I can scan the ones I have hard copies of - we have a PDF-scanning copy machine that would make it fast. That would provide some interesting power, and would probably pay off in the long run.


§ ita § - Feb 21, 2012 4:26:22 pm PST #19527 of 25501
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Technically you don't even need a connection ID, unless there's some reason you want to treat the relationship as an entity itself.

However, I'd just put it in a spreadsheet, if I didn't have a DB app to hand.


Typo Boy - Feb 21, 2012 4:30:02 pm PST #19528 of 25501
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.

You are right, but using short meaningless keys makes your appliation run faster and in general is cleaner. "smart keys" should be alternate keys, not primary keys. At least that was the way I was taught. Maybe obsolete now.

And GRis's statement makes me think there may be something out there like that - an old application that would do exactly what Gris wants. Except I can't remember the name of the application so it does not do Gris much fucking good.


§ ita § - Feb 21, 2012 4:33:11 pm PST #19529 of 25501
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

using short meaningless keys makes your appliation run faster and in general is cleaner

I think that depends on what you're trying to achieve and what you're trying to achieve it with. We have just had a vendor in telling us to lengthen our keys (as in, number of fields) for better performance, so there you go.