ha! I know.
I have not read Anathem or anything else by Stephenson, so I had no idea there were glossaries.
'Trash'
Got a question about technology? Ask it here. Discussion of hardware, software, TiVos, multi-region DVDs, Windows, Macs, LINUX, hand-helds, iPods, anything tech related. Better than any helpdesk!
ha! I know.
I have not read Anathem or anything else by Stephenson, so I had no idea there were glossaries.
I like how, when Amazon lists a price for an ebook at $9.99 they include a message that says that it's the publisher's price.
Doesn't B&N do cheap ebooks? You know, like Amazon does? (Signed, addicted to the Kindle Deal of the Day.)
I am irritated at the prices of the books for sale. Admittedly, most of the physical books I buy are used, but so many e-books that have had a number of paperback editions are priced at trade paperback levels or more.
There was just an article in the Tribune about this yesterday.
From Kathy's link:
John Makinson, chief executive of Penguin Group, says Penguin has seen some price resistance at the higher end, such as the $18.99 that it charges for the digital edition of Follett's "Fall of Giants."
"Some of the issue is that digital customers can't see how large the book actually is," he says.
I don't buy books by weight.
The reality is that producing e-books costs a tiny fraction of the cost of printing and shipping books. They make a good point about reducing the sales of printed books, but I don't think a business model in which e-books are subsidizing printed books is ultimately workable. They also mention authors' royalties, but that's a failure of an antiquated system for paying authors.
I don't buy books by weight.
no fucking shit.
the length of the book has a direct impact of the cost of the AUDIOBOOK, but less so on the ebook.
we are not crazy.
"Some of the issue is that digital customers can't see how large the book actually is," he says.
And some of the issue is that digital publishers can't see that their customers are not stupid enough to believe it costs more to deliver those extra pixels.
I... kind of do buy books by weight? In that I believe a really long book that is compelling all the way through is worth more to me than a short book of the same level, since it will give me many more hours of entertainment. I'm always amazed when a book like Game of Thrones, which enthralls me for days at a time, is the same price as a Meg Cabot book that I can read in 45 minutes. I actually think this encourages shorter books in the marketplace, which is sad, since I love the experience of a mega-tale.
I wouldn't pay the same price for a single episode of Friends as I would for The Fellowship of the Ring, you know?
By the way, P-C, I say give the ads a chance. They're not so bad, according to most reports, including my co-workers. If you don't end up liking the kindle they won't matter, and if you end up loving it but find the ads distasteful, $40 is still pretty cheap for the gadget.
And if you still don't like it, P-C, I can forward you my address. I'd happily pay the postage.
"Some of the issue is that digital customers can't see how large the book actually is," he says.
And some of the issue is that digital publishers can't see that their customers are not stupid enough to believe it costs more to deliver those extra pixels.
I work in the pixel mines every day! Those pixels are heavy! SO HEAVY.
I threw out my back kerning one day. It's brutal.
t /woe is the editor